Submission #13

Standard Chartered Bank

Question 1: What are the operational challenges of using the slotting approach? Is it possible to obtain comparable capital requirements across institutions using the slotting approach? Should the slotting approach in your view be extended to other types of exposures, if yes, which types of exposures would this be particularly relevant for? Refer to uploaded file

Question 2: What would be the preferred approach for the combination of the factors into a final assignment to a category? What are the advantages and drawback of either approach? Are both options equally clear or should further guidance be provided? Are there other approaches that could be used to harmonise how the different factors are combined into a final assignment for the risk weight? Refer to uploaded file

Question 3: Do you agree with the classification of specialised lending and the descriptions given? Refer to uploaded file

Question 4: Do you agree with these documentation requirements for each specialised lending exposure for which risk weights are assigned according to this Regulation? Refer to uploaded file

Question 5: Do you have any suggestions or comments on the assessment criteria for project finance? NA

Question 6: Do you have any suggestions or comments on the assessment criteria for real estate? Refer to uploaded file

Question 7: Do you have any suggestions or comments on the assessment criteria for object finance? NA

Question 8: Do you have any suggestions or comments on the assessment criteria for commodities finance? NA

Question 9: Do you have any suggestions or comments on the Impact Assessment? Refer to uploaded file

Upload files EBA_CP_2015_09_Standard Chartered response_20150811.pdf

Name of organisation Standard Chartered Bank