Submission #28

Primary tabs

View(active tab)

Axactor ASA

1. Do the respondents agree that these draft ITS fits for the purpose of the underlying directive? Please see comments in attached document(s).

2. What are the respondents’ views on the content of Template 1? Please provide any specific comment you may have on the data fields in the dedicated columns of the data glossary (Annex II to the draft ITS) added for your feedback. Please see comments in attached document(s).

3. What are the respondents’ views on the content of Template 3? Please provide any specific comment you may have on the data fields in the dedicated columns of the data glossary (Annex II to the draft ITS) added for your feedback. Please see comments in attached document(s).

4. What are the respondents’ views on the content of Template 4? Please provide any specific comment you may have on the data fields in the dedicated columns of the data glossary (Annex II to the draft ITS) added for your feedback. Please see comments in attached document(s).

5. What are the respondents’ views on the content of Template 5? Please provide any specific comment you may have on the data fields in the dedicated columns of the data glossary (Annex II to the draft ITS) added for your feedback? Please see comments in attached document(s).

6. Do the respondents agree on the structure of Template 2 to represent the relationship across the templates? If not, do you have any other suggestion of structure? Please see comments in attached document(s).

7. Do the respondents agree on the structure and the content of the data glossary? Please provide any specific comment you may have on the data fields in the dedicated columns of the data glossary (Annex II to the draft ITS) added for your feedback. Please see comments in attached document(s).

8. What are the respondents’ views on the content of instructions? Please see comments in attached document(s).

9. Do the respondents agree on the use of the ‘No data options’ as set out in the instructions? Please see comments in attached document(s).

10. What are respondents’ views on whether the proposed set of templates, data glossary and instructions are enough to achieve the data standardisation in the NPL transactions on secondary markets, or there may be a need for some further technical specifications or tools to support digital processing or efficient processing or use of technology (e.g., by means of the EBA Data Point Model or XBRL taxonomy)? Please see comments in attached document(s).

11. What are the respondents' views on the approach to the proportionality, including differentiating mandatory data fields around the threshold? Please provide any specific comment you may have on the data fields in the dedicated columns of the data glossary (Annex II to the draft ITS) added for your feedback. Please see comments in attached document(s).

12. Do the respondents agree with the proposed calibration of 25 000 euros threshold in line with AnaCredit Regulation? If not, what alternative threshold should be introduced, and why? Please see comments in attached document(s).

13. What are the respondents' views on the operational procedures, confidentiality and data governance requirements set out in the draft ITS? Please see comments in attached document(s).

Upload here the Annex II with your comments to the date fields 20220509 Axactor ASA - Annex II to EBA Consultation Paper dated 15 May 2022.pdf

Upload here any other file 20220905 (ExVer) Axactor ASA - Response to EBA Consultation Paper dated 15 May 2022 .pdf

Name of the organization Axactor ASA