Response to consultation paper on draft Guidelines on the interpretation of the different circumstances when an institution shall be considered as failing or likely to fail

Go back

Question 2: Do you consider the level of detail of these draft Guidelines to be appropriate?

See attached

Question 3: Do you consider the examples provided in Box 2 to be sufficiently clear and providing useful guidance?

See attached

Question 4: Do you have any comments on the proposed specification of circumstances which should be taken into account by the competent authority in determining that an institution is failing or likely to fail?

See attached

Question 5: Do you reckon that a significant decrease in asset value can be predefined in a quantitative manner? If yes, which threshold would you suggest for that purpose?

See attached

Question 6: Do you have any comments on the proposed specification of objective elements related to the capital position which should be taken into account by the resolution authority in determining that an institution is failing or likely to fail?

See attached

Question 7: Do you have any comments on the proposed specification of objective elements related to the liquidity position which should be taken into account by the resolution authority in determining that an institution as failing or likely to fail?

See attached

Question 8: Do you have any comments on the proposed specification of the circumstances, related to governance arrangements, which should be taken into account by the resolution authority in determining that an institution is failing or likely to fail?

See attached

Question 9: Do you have any comments on the proposed specification of the circumstances, related to the institution’s operational capacity to provide regulated activities, which should be taken into account by the resolution authority in determining that an institution is failing or likely to fail?

See attached

Upload files

Name of organisation

Banking Stakeholder Group