Response to consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards on resolution planning
Go back
Q1: Do you have any comments on the minimum essential information to be part of resolution plan summaries?
We believe that the frequency with benefit from a review every two years that would be confirmed by each NRA (if necessary in between). The PRS does not change that often and this could be analysed prior to the request by the NRA's if they believe that significant changes have occured.
Q2: Do you have any comments on the reorganisation of the resolvability assessment along the seven proposed dimensions?
NA
Q3: Do you have any comments on the elements to be considered under each resolvability di-mension?
NA
Q4: Do you have any comments on the proposed content for liquidation plans?
NA
Q5: Do you have comments on the process for the participation of the observers in the resolu-tion college?
NA
Q6: Do you have comments on the procedures for the exchange of information between the members of the resolution college?
NA
Q7: Do you have comments on the notification to the resolution college and the process that would be initiated by an emergency situation?
NA
Q8: Do you have comments on the process steps for reaching joint decisions?
We believe that each bank should always propose upfront the best decision and alternatives.
Q9: Do you have other comments in relation to the amended RTS?
NA