Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Asset Encumbrance - Treatment of Intraday

Where institutions hold surplus assets to manage intraday risk we would expect these assets should be reported as encumbered in AE-ASS and AE-COL (if security is held via reverse repo for example). In what line would the source encumbrance be reported on in the AE-SOU?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1491
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Asset Encumbrance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/06/2021

Non-Renewable loans and receivables

NSFR: Should non-renewable loans and receivables be presented as gross (not affected by general and specific allowances) or as net (affected by general and specific allowances)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1489
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 05/03/2021

Conditions to benefit from the 4% risk weight in Article 305(3) and treatment in Article 306

Does the application of the 4% risk weight referred to in Article 305(3) presuppose that the omnibus model meets all requirements set out in Article 305(2) lit (a) to (d) CRR and article 305(3) CRR together? Or, is Article 305(3) CRR meant to replace the requirement in article 305(2)(a), which presupposes an individual style segregation model?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1485
  • Topic: Market infrastructures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Correct time bucket for unsecured master agreements for derivative transactions, secured master agreements for derivative transactions and cash collateral posted/received under a master agreement

According to the instructions ANNEX 13 of "Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions" Institutions shall calculate derivative assets and liabilities according to regulatory netting rules, not accounting rules, and report the amounts in both template 1.1. “Required funding” and template 1.2 “Stable funding” accordingly. 1.) Regarding unsecured master agreements (i.e. no collateral posted/received) for derivative transactions: in what time bucket should the amount after netting (according to regulatory netting rules) be recorded? 2.) Regarding secured master agreements (i.e. collateral posted/received and daily margining) for derivative transactions: in what time bucket should the amount after netting (according to regulatory netting rules) be recorded? 3.) Regarding cash collateral which is posted under a derivative master agreement: in what time bucket (column) and row (i.e. duration of encumbrance) should the cash collateral be recorded?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_1479
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 05/03/2021

Exemption of purchased receivables from Aricle 405's retention requirement

Do the provisions in Article 405(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 apply to purchased receivables?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1474
  • Topic: Securitisation and Covered Bonds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/02/2015

Validation of LCR Submission

Is validation rule v1512_m correct?v1512 m - C52.00, Row 1140 - 1210, Additional Outflows: As it is not explicitly clear from the rules or guidance as to how to treat cash assets (e.g. cash held at a bank) in this particular section, it has been interpreted that the columns to be populated are as follows: - {c030} Market Value: Represents the market value of non-cash assets (i.e. excludes cash balances) - {c040} Value according to Article 418: Represents (i) the market value of non-cash assets after the deduction of an appropriate haircut as per Article 418, plus (ii) the full value of cash balances, in line with Article 416(1)(a). - {c020} Outflow: Outflow calculated based on cash and non-cash assets as prescribed by Article 423. Based on the interpretation above, as cash balances are excluded from {c030} Market Value, validation v1512_m fails.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1473
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 05/03/2021

C 41.00 - Inconsistency between Validations and EBA member/dimension types causes validation v0668_m to fail

Validation rule v0668_m states that r{r010} = sum(r020-100). We believe this validation rule will fail due to the fact that the categorisation of row 100 (x3 - 'Defaulted') for dimension Impairment status is different than the one for row 010 (x5 -'Non defaulted') which represents the total as per the validation rule.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1466
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Leverage ratio
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/02/2017

Template C 08.02 - Col 080 has Missing 'CRM Effects/Collateral' dimension

In template C 08.02, col 080 is defined without the dimension 'CRM Effects/Collateral [CRM]'. This looks logically incorrect and would also result in failure of validation rule: v0347_m {c090} = {c020} + {c070} + {c080}

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1464
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/12/2019

Large Exposures - maturity buckets

Is it possible to report negative amounts in some maturity buckets of the exposure in LE4 and LE5 templates? According to the validation rules, every column in template LE4 and LE5 should be larger than or equal to zero.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1455
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/03/2015

The approach that AMA credit institutions should use when determining the relevant indicator in order to fill in C 16.00 – Operational risk template.

Which is the approach that AMA credit institutions should use when computing the relevant indicator that should be reported in line 130 columns 010-030 of the C 16.00 – Operational risk template?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1448
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/03/2015

Treatment of central banks as non-financial customers or financial customers

If an institution has unsecured deposits from a central bank, are those deposits from financial customers or deposits from non-financial customers?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1446
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:

Groups of connected clients when a client is connected through various criteria (interconnection through control and / or economic interconnection)

As defined in Article 4(1)(39) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR), clients can be included into ‘groups of connected clients’ through criteria of control (Article 4(1)(39)(a)) or economic interconnection (Article 4(1)(39)(b)).What is the correct treatment of exposure to a client in case when the client is connected with other natural or legal persons through criteria of control and / or economic interconnection?Should the institution include and report all those clients connected with particular client as one ‘group of connected clients’ regardless of criteria of connection (control vs. economic interconnection) or should the institution include and report particular client in two (or more) groups where one group includes clients that are connected with particular client through criteria of control and the other separate group (or more groups) is formed of clients that are connected with particular client through criteria of economic interconnection?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1443
  • Topic: Large exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/11/2017

Reporting the income or expense resulting from the recalculation of the carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability as prescribed by IFRS 9.B5.4.6.

Our question is where (under what item) should be presented in the template F 02.00 “Statement of profit or loss” the income or expense resulting from the recalculation of the carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability as prescribed by IFRS 9.B5.4.6. Furthermore, it would be helpful for us to have your confirmation that the respective adjustment is deducted when presenting the gross carrying amount of the financial asset.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2014_1441
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/02/2022

Securities Lending

In the guidance on asset encumbrance Annex XVII, chapter 2.1.1, paragraph 14 (d) it states that ‘where the securities lent as collateral are received by the reporting institution, their fair value is reported in {AE-COL; *; c010}, {AE-SOU; r150; c030} and {AE-SOU; r150; c040}’.However, {r150; c040} is greyed out in template F 32.04.Please advise whether this data point will be available for input. 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1431
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Asset Encumbrance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/07/2017

Recognition of contractual netting agreements by the competent authority

Should the provision of Article 296(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) that “competent authorities shall recognise a contractual netting agreement …” be understood as a requirement to have an acceptance made by the supervisory authority, in particular in the course of performing its on-site or off-site activities, or rather to receive a formal permission (e.g. in a form of an administrative decision) of a competent authority?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1424
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 12/12/2014

Internal model for correlation trading

For an internal model for incremental default risk and migration risk “an institution may choose to consistently use a one-year constant position assumption.” (Second sentence of Article 374 (4) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)). Does an institution also have this choice for an internal model for correlation trading?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1422
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 19/12/2014

Row 030 C07.00 reported also for exposure class of protection provider

Should the part of the "eligible" SME exposure according to Article 501 CRR that is secured with e.g. guarantee be reported in the row 030 (C07.00) in the exposure class of the guarantor and also be subject to the supporting factor?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1419
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Significance of the term ‘without prejudice’ in Article 86 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)

Article 86 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) sets out a general principle of limitation of minority interests / external resources on Additional Tier 1 capital. This article explicitly provides that this limitation is ‘without prejudice to Article 84(5) and (6)’. Article 84 of the CRR sets a principle of limitation of minority interests in the computation of consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital. However, the exception under Article 84(6) CRR allows institutions to recognise all minority interests when included in the scope of an Institutional Protection Scheme (IPS) completed with a cross-guarantee scheme. Does the term ‘without prejudice’ mean that the exception for CET1 capital provided for in Article 84(6) can be applied by analogy to the instruments of Article 86 in order to avoid a partial recognition on the Additional Tier 1 capital.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1415
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/06/2015

Groups including investment firm(s) referred to in Article 95(1) and investment firm(s) referred to in Article 96(1) and not including credit institutions.

What method of calculating the own funds requirement should be used when a group consists of both 95(1) and 96(1) investments firm and no credit institutions?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1414
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Balance Sheet Netting as a CRM technique

Is Balance Sheet Netting according to Article 195 limited to Cash Balances in the same currency?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1413
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022