Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

v0679_m: taxonomy is incorrect.

The validation rule for the RWA of the off-balance sheet items (C43.00 r010, c020) only considers the RWA of the off-balance sheet items subject to credit risk in Total-Standard approach (C 07.00a r080, c220, s001) and the RWA of the off-balance sheet items subject to credit risk in Total-IRB Approach to capital requirement with own estimates of LGD and/or conversion factors (C 08.01a r030, c260, s001). Should the RWA of the off-balance sheet items subject to credit risk in Total-IRB Approach to capital requirement without own estimates of LGD and/or conversion factors (C 08.01a r030, c260, s002) also be considered in this validation rule?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1251
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Leverage ratio
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/10/2014

First time application of country-by-country reporting – interaction between Article 89 paragraphs (1) and (2)

How should the provisions of Article 89 of Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD), and in particular paragraphs (1) and (2) be applied. In addition, what are the implications for institutions whose financial year is not aligned with the calendar year? How do the provisions in paragraphs (1) and (2) interact with the requirement in paragraph (4) according to which the published information shall be audited in accordance with Directive 2006/43/EC.

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1250
  • Topic: Other issues
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/06/2014

What is ‘turnover’ for the purposes of Country-by-Country reporting?

Could the EBA clarify what would be considered ‘turnover’ for the purposes of country-by-country reporting in Article 89(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1249
  • Topic: Other issues
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/06/2014

Definition of ‘establishment’ for the purposes of Country-by-Country reporting – scope of consolidation

What would be considered an ‘establishment’ for the purposes of country-by-country reporting in Article 89(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)? For the purposes of consolidation, should the prudential or the accounting scope of consolidation be applied?

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1248
  • Topic: Other issues
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/06/2014

C 09.03 - Calculation of the breakdown of total own funds requirements for credit risk of relevant credit exposures by country (CR GB 3)

Suppose that a bank has an exposure an own funds requirements to country A of € 10,000 while the bank’s total exposures total own funds requirements (i.e. the aggregate exposure aggregated own funds requirements to all countries) is € 500,000. In addition, let’s say that the bank’s own funds is € 80,000. Would this mean that for the purposes of template C 09.03, under the sheet related to country A, the bank is required to report the amount of € 1,600 (i.e. (€ 10,000 / € 500,000) x € 80,000)?Is the method above correct to calculate total own funds requirement for credit risk of relevant credit exposures by country or are there any guidelines issued by the EBA or found in the CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1247
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 09/09/2016

Inclusion of interim profits in CET1

If a credit institution includes interim profits in Common Equity Tier 1 capital (with the prior permission from the competent authority in accordance with Article 26(2) of the CRR), can the institution decide that in the following interim period it will not apply for a permission concerning interim profits for that (current) interim period, but to use the (previously permitted) amount of interim profits for the previous interim period? For example, a credit institution received a prior permission from the competent authority and included interim profits reported on 30 June in its CET1 capital. When calculating CET1 capital on 30 September, can it choose not to apply for a prior permission from the competent authority to use interim profits reported on 30 September and, instead, include the amount of interim profits reported on 30 June (the same amount it has included in the calculation in the previous quarter)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1242
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 08/05/2015

Leasing: Residual value risk

In the calculation of the exposure value for residual value risk of leased assets, is the "residual value" that has to be multiplied with 1/t (a) the residual value on the date of calculation / the reporting date or (b) the estimated residual value at the end of the lease term?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1241
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/03/2015

FINREP: Definition of „Non-Financial Corporations” in Template 6 – Breakdown of loans and advances to non-financial corporations by NACE code

Should this table include deals with non-financial corporation as defined in Annex V, Part 1, Paragraph 35 (e) or all deals with counterparties with their core business in non-financial sectors (e.g. also including general governments and households as defined in Annex V, Part 1, Paragraph 35 (b) & (f))?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_1237
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 29/01/2016

Operational Risk templates

In order to fulfill the information of operational risk losses, we would like to know if we should include the following concept of losses: -Operational risk related credit risk losses. Losses included in the credit risk capital data base, but originated for an operational risk event.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1233
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 09/09/2016

CoRep 12 and 13 - Validation rules v0508_m, v0514_m, v0532_m and v0538_m

The validation rules v0508_m and v0514_m for C 12.00 cannot be true at the same time in case there is any exposure subject to Look-Through or Internal Assesment Approach (breakdown of outstanding positionsaccording to CQS at inception is not applicable in these cases). The same applies for rules v0532_m and v0538_m for C 13.00 in case of Look-Through, Internal Assesment Approach or Supervisory Formula Method.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1231
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Liquidity templates and instructions

We found some inconsistencies between the templates, the instructions and the CRR. Please confirm the following: 1. In template C61.00, rows 140-180 (which is 1.2.3.1 to 1.2.3.3.1) should refer to Article 427 CRR instead of Article 414. The rest of those references on sub-article basis seem correct. 2. In Annex XIII, Part I the title for row 540 is different compared to the one in the template and does not correspond the text of Annex III, point 5 of the CRR. The text of Annex XIII should be amended accordingly. The same problem is present in Annex XIII, Part II, row 610 and Annex XIII, Part III, row 590. 3. In Annex XIII, Part I the title for rows 710-730 is different compared to the one in the template. We think that this is the correct title ("... not already reported in 1.10 to 1.11.3") and suggest to change the template accordingly. 4. In Annex XIII, Part I the title for rows 740-760 is different compared to the one in the template. We think this title should be amended because the the title used in the template seems to be the correct one. 5. In Annex XIII, Part I the title for row 820 is different compared to the on in the template. We think this is the correct title ("... reported in 4.6 - 4.10") and suggest to change the template accordingly. Similar issue is present in Annex XIII, Part II, row 890 where the correct title should be the one used in the template. Also such issue is found in Annex XIII, Part III, row 870 where the correct title is the one used in the instructions and the template should be amended accordingly. 6. In Annex XIII, Part II, the title for rows 1110-1120 and the indivudual titles for rows 1110 and 1120 are identical. We suggest to take the correct titles from the template. 7. In Annex XIII, Part III, the title for row 030 is different compared to the one in the template. We think this is the correct title and suggest to change the template accordingly. 8. In Annex XIII, Part V.1, the explanation for rows 140-200 is non conistent with the template. As the instructions seem correct, we suggest yoy amend the template legal reference accordingly.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_1227
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 05/03/2021

Eligibility of subordinated loans for classification as Tier 2 instruments when the rules governing their issue contemplate an obligation of the issuer to repurchase a percentage of them (eligibility limited to the amount of subordinated loans not subject to such repurchase obligation).

Pursuant to the combined application of articles 63 letter k) and 66 letter a) it is correct that a clause – also included in the rules governing the issue of subordinated loans – according to which an issuer is obliged to repurchase a specified amount of subordinated loans does not prevent from classifying such financial instruments as Tier 2 instruments if, in compliance with article 66 letter a), the percentage of subordinated loans that shall be repurchased by the issuer is deducted from Tier 2 items? In other words, a subordinated loans can be classified as Tier 2 instruments if the provisions governing their issue contemplate the undertaking of the issuer to repurchase a specified percentage of the issued subordinated loans provided that - in compliance with article 66 letter a) of CRR - such percentage is deducted from Tier 2 items? The undertaking of the issuer to repurchase part of subordinated loans deriving from the rules governing the issue of such subordinated loans can be considered as a repurchase “contractual obligation” and as a consequence may it fall within one of the cases contemplated under the provisions of article 66 letter a) of CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1226
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 29/08/2014

FINREP template F 40.01 – Group Structure Listing - Entity by Entity

Regarding the definition 124(p)“Acquisition cost” means the amount paid by the investors.”:a)where the company has changed ownership but is still within the group, does the amount paid refer to the initial amount paid on entry into the Group or to the amount paid by the current investor.b)where a subsidiary has not been purchased but rather has been set up by the investor does the amount paid refer to the initial share capital invested ( which can often just be a nominal amount eg: EUR3)

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1222
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 25/11/2016

Inclusion of consolidated current and year-end profits in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital

According to Articles 18 and 19 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR), institutions have to carry out a prudential consolidation. The scope of entities included in prudential consolidation can differ from the scope of full financial consolidation. For the purposes of meeting the requirements of Article 26(2) of the CRR, should the current as well as year-end profits resulting from the prudential consolidation also be verified by persons independent of the institution that are responsible for the auditing of the accounts of that institution? Is the General Meeting of Shareholders obliged to confirm the year-end profit for the Group prudentially consolidated, in addition to the year-end profit for the Group financially consolidated?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1221
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/03/2015

Own Funds - Subordinated loans as Tier 2 instruments

Our interpretation of Article 63 (g) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (Regulation 575/2013 is that subordinated loans which are perpetual (i.e. do not have a maturity date) would also qualify as Tier 2 instruments under article 63 (g) of the CRR, given that the original maturity would exceed five years (i.e. it would be for an indefinite period). Do you agree with our interpretation? Or is it only subordinated loans with a fixed redemption date (and whose original maturity is of at least five years) which should be recognised as Tier 2 instruments?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1220
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 29/08/2014

Template F 22.01: Fee and commission income and expenses by activity

Should a bank report all commission income / expenses in template F 22.01 or just the part related to off balance sheet activities?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1219
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/10/2016

Inclusion of expected loss for equity exposures in calculation of Expected loss amount reducing CET1

Shall the expected loss amount for equity exposures under the IRB approach be offset against the specific and general credit risk adjustments of all risk positions?If not, how shall they be treated? Does it has to be deducted from CET 1 in either case, also if there is a surplus increasing T2 according to Article 62 (d)?Does this also mean that EL for equity exposures shall be reported in CA4 row 140 respective 155 or not?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1217
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Instruction on reporting of other transferable assets

In annex XII, table template C 51.00, row 1.3.1 (1.3.1.1 and 1.3.1.2) the institutions should report on other transferable assets representing claims on or guaranteed by transferable assets representing claims on or guaranteed by the central government of a Member State, on a region with fiscal autonomy to raise and collect taxes, or of a third country in the domestic currency of the central or regional government, if the institution incurs a liquidity risk in that Member State or third country that it covers by holding those liquid assets. The instructions are not fully clear to us and we have the following questions on what to report on the rows 1.3.1.1-2: Is this only valid for ”Member State” or is the second phrase ”on a region…” an own definition of issuers, and in that case, is municipalities a part of that definition? Is ”domestic currency” only referring to ”third country” or all other previous issuers defined in the sentence (Member State and perhaps ”a region…”)? Is ”if the institution incurs…” referring to all issuers in the sentence, i.e. it is a general requirement that the assets can only be included here if they cover the incurred liquidity risk? Does this mean that if you have an LCR>100%, in the currency or for the institution, no assets are allowed to be included? Or is there another definition of “liquidity risk…that it covers”? To summarize 1.3.1, we would like to know: - What issuers and guarantors are allowed? - Is there any restrictions on any of these assets, e.g. asset issued in domestic currency? - Is there a cap on any of these assets, e.g. only a portion of the assets may be included in the reporting?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_1216
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 05/03/2021

Recognition of real estate as commercial property

1. What kind of assets are to be included in the “Residential” and “Commercial” categories within “Mortgage Loans” for the purposes of supervisory reporting? For instance where should institutions assign garages, plots of land, storage rooms and rustic property etc. which are used as collateral? Are there more specific criteria to be used in assigning these assets? 2. Can we recognize as Commercial Real Estate the following types of property: Land for development, factories, plots of land for commercial purposes, slotted houses, schools and quarries etc.?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1214
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/11/2014

Is validation rule v3897_s correct and shall be strictly adhered to?

There are a number of sign validation rules which are applied to the FINREP templates. Are all of them correct and shall be strictly adhered to?For example, rule v3897_s requires that all items in template F 01.01 (FINREP) are greater or equal to 0. This validation may not be applicable for some of the items in template F 01.01, such as row 250 – 'Fair Value changes of the hedged items in portfolio hedge of interest rate risk'. As this item (row 250) may be a contra-asset account (i.e. reducing the total assets balance), shall it nevertheless be reported as a positive number (as required by the validation rule)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1204
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/10/2016