Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

CoRep Reporting C07.00 Template - Clarification regarding Default in Equity Exposures

The COREP template C07.00 requires institutions to report all counterparties treated under the Standardised risk weight approach to be split by Asset Class. These 'Asset Classes' are defined under Article 112 of CRR. The template clearly calls out that for the 'Exposure in Default' Asset Class, any exposure that is not subject to 'Equities' (under Article 133) should be included, hence the Equities exposures positions are not reported under Exposure in Default Asset Class.  The COREP template has a specific section to report Default in Equity Exposures – Row 0015. However, there is no definition of Equity Exposures at Default from a standardized risk weight perspective, hence we are seeking clarity on how this should be managed/disclosed. For example, we are now needing to disclose counterparties that have had loan restructuring and as part of this, equities have been issued and hence, this is where the Equity exposure position is classified as default.   

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7534
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

CoRep Template C07.00 - Clarification on “of which: Exposures to central banks”

As part of COREP template C07.00, Banks are required to disclose counterparties subject to Standardised risk weight split by Asset Classes such as 'Central Government or Central Banks', 'Regional Government', 'Public Sector Entities'. The template also requires additional data points to be disclosed including “of which: Exposures to central banks” – Row no. 0011. The COREP guidance for the above Row 0011 refers Article 112 (a) of CRR. However this article refers to Asset Class as “Exposures to Central Government or Central Banks”. This leads to an ambiguity in the disclosure. The firm is currently disclosing only exposures to 'Central Banks' even though the article reference is to Exposure to Central Government or Central Banks. We seeking to confirm the treatment to be applied. 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7535
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

Reporting of losses from lending collateralised by immovable property (C_15.00)

For loans secured by real estate property with any of the credit history scenarios below, should losses, and in case of scenario iii., exposures, be reported in COREP template C 15.00?  If yes, for which default event or events should the estimated losses be included in the reporting (i.e. is it correct to assume that under scenario ii. only losses estimated for the last default event in the reporting period should be included)?  Also, which default event should be used as a reference date for the reported exposures under scenario i. (the reporting period or the year prior to it) and under scenario ii. (exposure value at the first or at the last default event during the reporting period)? i. scenario:  The loan secured by real estate property had defaulted in a year prior to the reporting period, subsequently it exited/cured from the default state in the reporting period, but later it defaulted again during the same reporting period, and it stayed in the default state until the end of the period. ii. scenario:  The loan secured by real estate property had defaulted in the reporting period, later it exited/cured from the default state in the same reporting period, but still in the same period it defaulted again and stayed in the default state until the end of the period. iii. scenario: The loan secured by real estate property had defaulted in the reporting period and subsequently in the same period the institution stopped recognising the real estate property as CRR-eligible collateral (the real estate property ceased to meet the eligibility criteria).

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7540
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

Validation rule v23688_s requiring only non-negative amounts appears incorrect

Is validation rule v23688_s incorrect? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2025_7547
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

C06.02 - v23688_s - Non negative control

The control indicates that the following columns have to be positive :   c0360 = consolidated own funds   c0370 = of which : common equity Tier 1   c0390 = oh which: contribution to consolidated result Should this control be applicable?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7548
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

C07.00 - v23338_m - RW of 70% empty

The EBA Validation Rule v23338_m applicable to C07.00 COREP template states that the line 210 that concerns the RW of 70% must be empty. Should this control should be applicable?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7549
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

C17.01 - v23507_h - Sum of number events by Basel Business Line

Is the aggregation logic assumed by the control v23507_h is not applicable in this context.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7550
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

C17.01 - v23508_h - Sum of number of events by Basel Business Line

Is the aggregation logic assumed by the control v23508_h applicable in this context?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7551
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

v23509_h and v23510_h

Are the validation rules v23509_h and v23510_h correct when reading the reporting instruction of the ITS. In our view the reporting instruction of the ITS is not clear enough.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7552
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

Validation rules v23509_h and v23510_h appear incorrect

Are validation rules v23509_h and v23510_h correct?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2025_7555
  • Topic: Operational risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

C_ 08.01.a - qx 2068 – “Retail exposures - Secured by residential real estate”

Should the retail exposures secured by residential real estate to a natural person and the retail exposures secured by residential real estate to an SME both be assigned to the exposure class of “Retail exposures secured by residential real estate” in C_08.01.a qx 2068?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7561
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_17.01

Validation rule v23510_h incorrect

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7573
  • Topic: Operational risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

Presentation of lending for house purchase

Can loans that are directly disbursed to customers be considered as lending for house purchase?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2025_7578
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

The instructions for row 0170 C10.00 seem inconsistent.

The instructions for row 0170 C10.00 seem inconsistent. The title of the line item "Of which: categorised as secured by residential real estate in IRB" refers to secured by residential real estate. Whereas further instructions, "Exposures assigned under IRB approach to the exposure class 'Purchased receivables' pursuant to Article 147(2), point (d)(ii) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.", refers to Purchased recaivables. The article mentioned, 147(2)(d)(ii), refers to retail exposures secured by residential property.  Is our understanding correct that this row should not only be populated for Purchased receivables under the IRB approach but actually should be populated for secured by residential real estate under IRB approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7579
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

FINREP – Loan commitments, financial guarantees and other commitments given

In the context of FINREP template F 09.01, could the EBA clarify whether the scope of columns 0100 and 0110 is intended to include exposures (commitments and certain contractual arrangements that are not commitments as referred to in CRR Article 5/110a/111(4)) that fall under CRR3 Annex I but are not recognised or disclosed under IFRS 9, IFRS 7 or IAS 37?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2025_7592
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

COREP Template 236. Specialised Lending Supervisory Slotting Method

How should institutions reflect, in COREP template C 08.01, credit risk mitigation (CRM) techniques applied to exposures subject to the slotting approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7596
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/10/2025

ASF factor for AT1 and T2 capital instruments with residual maturity of a minimum of six months but less than one year

For the purposes of calculating available stable funding, what ASF factor shall be used for capital instruments with residual maturity of a minimum of six months but less than one year?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2025_7346
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 21/10/2025

Reporting of retained own issuances in the ALMM C 66.01 maturity ladder template

How should credit institutions report, at consolidated level, in the ALMM C 66.01 maturity ladder template, retained own issuances that do not appear on the consolidated balance sheet?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7331
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 21/10/2025

Finrep validation between F09.01.1 and F18.00 other commitments given

If we have undrawn credit facilities that based on CRR Annex I are reported under Other commitments given in F18.00 r0480 c0010, but they do not meet any of the conditions described in Annex V Part 2.105 (a-c) to be reported in F09.01.1, we cannot report them on F09.01.1 but in F18.00 only.  Validation errors  v2795_m: [F 18.00.e, F 09.01.1] {F 18.00.e, r0480, c0010} = {F 09.01, r0170, c0010} + xsum({F 09.01.1, (r0170, c0010, c0020, c0030, c0035, c0100)}) and v2797_m: [F 18.00.e, F 09.01.1] {F 18.00.e, r0500, c0010} = {F 09.01, r0200, c0010} + xsum({F 09.01.1, (r0200, c0010, c0020, c0030, c0035, c0100)})  require that Other commitments given match in both these tables. What if the conditions mentioned in Annex V Part2.105 are not met for the other commitments given in F18.00?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7569
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 16/10/2025

Recognition of FX hedging on loan collateral value for volatility adjustments for currency mismatch

In case of a loan secured by financial collateral where the currency of the loan differs from the currency of the collateral, the FX risk is hedged by a financial instrument (cross-currency swap) which proceeds are pledged by the obligor to the lending institution. Such cross-currency swap hedge allows the lending institution to offset any loan collateral value decrease due to a depreciation of the collateral’s currency, thus neutralising any effect from the currency mismatch between the currency of the loan and the currency of the collateral. In this case, is it possible to assimilate for the purpose of article 223(1) of CRR that the collateral is denominated in the same currency as the loan (implying that no volatility adjustments for currency mismatch would apply) ?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7532
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 16/10/2025