Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Use of short-term issuer credit assessments under Article 131

May short-term issuer ratings be used to derive risk weights for unrated short-term exposures in the context of Article 131 CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2026_7687
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 26/01/2026

Alternative treatment and SME support factor

If an institution uses the alternative treatment i CRR3 article 230 (4), does the exposure then qualify to use the SME supporting factor?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2026_7682
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 15/01/2026

I couldn´t find this question.

We request EBA’s clarification on the application of Article 402 CRR to exposures fully secured by commercial property classified as IPRE under CRR III, but risk‑weighted as non‑IPRE in accordance with the exemption defined in Article 126(2) because the property meets the national conditions applicable in Sweden (the so‑called “hard test”). Specifically: 2.1 Eligibility for Article 402 when collateral is IPRE by classificationDoes the collateral’s IPRE classification affect eligibility for the Article 402 exposure value reduction, specifically for large exposures where the risk-weighting due to the exemption in Article 126(2) is treated as non-IPRE due to national conditions in Sweden (the so-called “hard test”) 2.2 Treatment under Swedish national conditionsIn cases where national authorities allow commercial IPRE collateral to be risk-weighted as non-IPRE under Article 126(2) (Swedish hard test), can the bank apply the Article 402 reduction, assuming all CRM requirements under Articles 399, 208, and 229 are satisfied? In other words: Does Article 402 eligibility follow the risk-weighting treatment under Article 126.2, or does it follow the classification of the collateral under CRR III?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7670
  • Topic: Large exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/01/2026

reverse solicitation

The reverse solicitation is where a client or counterparty approaches an undertaking established in a third country at its own exclusive initiative for the provision of banking services, including their continuation, or banking services closely related to those originally solicited.  Is the invitation letter from the agent bank who arranges for the syndicated loans or Schuldscheindarlehen ("SSD") a sufficient supporting document to evidence that a client approaches us at its own exclusive initiative? Or an independent declaration directly made from the borrower (the client) is required?  

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7665
  • Topic: Passporting and supervision of branches
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 22/01/2026

Applying the provisions of Article 390 (7) CRR and Delegated Regulation 1187/2014 for determining the overall exposure to a client or a group of connected clients in respect of transactions with underlying assets for received collaterals (indirect exposures) after applying substitution approach according to Article 403 CRR 

Does a credit institution have to apply the provisions of Article 390 (7) CRR in combination with Delegated Regulation 1187/2014 to a securitization or investment fund exposure, when the credit institution received the securitization or investment fund exposure as a collateral in an SFT?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 1187/2014 - RTS for determining the overall exposure to a client or a group of connected clients in respect of transactions with underlying assets
  • ID: 2025_7661
  • Topic: Large exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/01/2026

FINREP Identical Cells 5458783, 5458788, 5459395, 5460187

Could the EBA confirm whether these identical cell checks are correct? If not, should they be updated to align with the previous logic (v8610_i, v8611_i, v10006_i, v10007_i) to ensure consistency between templates and definitions?Please clarify the intended scope of collateral reporting in these templates and whether the current rules will be revised.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7660
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/12/2025

FINREP Validation rules v23845_h, v23846_h, v23847_h

Could the EBA clarify the rationale for excluding rows 0015, 0185, and 0365 from the new validation rules for template F 12.01.a?This change creates inconsistencies with cross-template validation rules such as: v6030_m: {tF_12.01.a, r0010, c0100} - {tF_12.01.a, r0015, c0100} = {tF_04.03.1, r0180, c0050} + {tF_04.04.1, r0140, c0050} v6033_m: {tF_12.01.a, r0180, c0100} - {tF_12.01.a, r0185, c0100} = {tF_04.03.1, r0180, c0060} + {tF_04.04.1, r0140, c0060} v6036_m: {tF_12.01.a, r0360, c0100} - {tF_12.01.a, r0365, c0100} = {tF_04.03.1, r0180, c0070} + {tF_04.04.1, r0140, c0070} These rules assume that rows 0010, 0180, and 0360 include “Cash balances at central banks and other demand deposits.” Additionally, the items “of which: collectively measured allowances” and “of which: individually measured allowances” will no longer consider these balances because the related rules (v5054_m, v5055_m, v5056_m) reference rows 0010, 0180, and 0360 only. Could the EBA confirm whether this exclusion is intentional and, if so, provide guidance on how to reconcile these templates and validation rules?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7659
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/12/2025

Controls v4968_m, v5024_m, v5372_m, v5373_m and v5376_m

Please note that controls v4968_m, v5024_m, v5372_m, v5373_m and v5376_m should have the condition "eba_qAS:qx2004" instead of "eba_AS:x2" to comply with column 010 of row 010 of report F_00.01

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7655
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/12/2025

C_07.00 : columns 010 to 040 of line 210

I would like to point out that columns 010 to 040 of line 210 of report C_07.00 should have been ungreased in the EBA 4.2 taxonomy to be in accordance with the EBA's answer to question 2025_7348.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7654
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/12/2025

Calculation of the unmargined exposure value for a netting set with multiple margin agreement or including both transaction subject to a margin agreement and transaction not subject to a margin agreement

How to calculate the capped exposure value, i.e., the exposure value of the netting set in the event that it is not subject to any type of margin agreement, when there are multiple margin agreements applicable to this netting set or when this netting set includes both transactions subject to a margin agreement and transactions not subject to a margin agreement? For the calculation of the unmargined value, should all deals be included in a single sub-netting set (the one containing contracts not subject to margining) and not divided as required by paragraph 4 of Article 274, or should the sub-netting sets remain separate and their value be calculated as if they were unmargined?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7649
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 26/01/2026

Template C90.00 and C90.05

For the purpose of determining the "On- and off-balance sheet business subject to market risk" for template C90, is the netting between long and short positions in the same exact instrument allowed? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2025_7647
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 26/01/2026

EBA publication of loss rates for Swiss residential and commercial property under CRR Articles 125 and 126.

Will the EBA publish loss rate data for Swiss residential and commercial property markets to enable institutions to apply preferential risk weights under Articles 125 and 126 CRR? If yes, what is the expected timeline?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7635
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 19/12/2025

Clarification on the relationship between Margin of Conservatism (MoC) and rating/calibration philosophy (PIT vs TTC) under EBA Guidelines on PD and LGD estimation (EBA/GL/2017/16)

According to the EBA Guidelines on PD and LGD estimation (EBA/GL/2017/16), the Margin of Conservatism (MoC) aims to address uncertainty arising from data and methodological deficiencies, changes in underwriting standards or risk appetite, and general estimation error. The Guidelines describe the three MoC categories (A, B, C) and the principles for quantification, but they do not explicitly refer to any link between MoC and the chosen rating philosophy (Point-in-Time vs Through-the-Cycle) or calibration philosophy. Could you please clarify whether the regulator expects the MoC concept to be aligned with the institution’s PIT/TTC philosophy, or whether MoC is entirely independent of the rating/calibration philosophy?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2017/16 - Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures
  • ID: 2025_7634
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 19/12/2025

Template 2 - EBA validation rules v89325_m and v89326_m

The formula linked to the following rule IDs: v89325_m and v89326_m appears to be incorrect

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures
  • ID: 2025_7633
  • Topic: Transparency and Pillar 3
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 12/01/2026

Obligations in Equity exposures of Article 133 (1) (c) (i) CRR

Does the term “obligation” in Article 133 (1) (c) (i) CRR refer to the principal amount, or does it also refer to the interest payment solely? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7631
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 19/12/2025

Netting of foreign exchange derivatives (as per Annex (II, a-e) of Reg. No 575/2013) in Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)

What criterion should be adopted for the treatment of a foreign-exchange derivative contract included in a netting set between what reported in Article 428d(4) and in Article 428d(2) of CRR2?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7625
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/12/2025

Corporate exposures in C10.00 memorandum lines r0250 and r0260

In template C10.00, institutions that apply the IRB approach, shall break down IRB exposures by SA exposure class. This template includes the following 2 memorandum lines: r0250 Corporates - F-IRB  r0260 Corporates - A-IRB How should 'Corporates' be interpreted for these two memorandum lines? Does that relate to the volume reported on rows r0100 (Corporates - other) and r0120 (corporates - specialised lending) of template c10.00? The ITS does not clarify this. Therefore the question is whether the sum of rows r0250 and r0260 should reconcile with the sum of C10.00 rows r0100 and r0120? An alternative interpretation is that the SUM of rows r0250 and r0260 should reconcile with the sum of corporate exposures reported in the C08.01 IRB template. We feel that this alternative interpretation is not logical as it would repeat numbers already (separately) reported in C08.01 and separately identifiable, both whether it relates to 'corporates' and whether it relates to A-IRB and F-IRB is identifiable via the Z-axis. Therefore we feel that this interpretation will not add any added value. Could you please clarify to which 'Corporates' lines r0250 and r0260 refer?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7624
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/11/2025

Pillar 3 Template EULR2 - LRCom: Leverage ratio common disclosure (Row 24) Instruction

Pillar 3 Template EULR2 - LRCom: Leverage ratio common disclosure (Row 24) Instruction In the current instruction for Row 24, it states: “Sum of amounts in rows 7, 13, 18, 22, and EU-22k of EU LR2 – LRCom.” However, based on the latest EBA mapping table/logic, the correct reference should be: LRCom (sum of rows 7, 13, 18, 22, EU-22m). This aligns with our understanding that the correct row is EU-22m, not EU-22k. Could EBA please update the instruction accordingly?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/637 - ITS with regard to disclosures of information referred to in Titles II and III of Part Eight CRR
  • ID: 2025_7620
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 12/01/2026

v6332 - Negative FV changes os hedged intems (C 32.01)

In relation to Q&A 2022_6511 where a question was raised related to validation rule v6566_s. We believe validation rule v6332_m should be deactivated for row 120.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2025_7619
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/11/2025

Liability category of margins received

Could you please clarify if margins received, part of a repo or derivative netting agreement can always, regardless of whether the netting results in a net liability or asset position, be considered r0120 - Secured liabilities, or should be allocated to other liability categories as defined in Resolution Plans report Z02? 

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on the provision of information for the purpose of resolution plans
  • ID: 2025_7615
  • Topic: Resolution plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/11/2025