Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

List of Q&A's

Possible error in v8116_m

Is the following rule v8116_m: [F18.01 (c0020)] {r0050} <= {r0060} correct?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Deposit broker

If the original depositor is a PIC, could be classified as a deposit broker?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Meaning of "established in the Union"

Article 18 of the Securitisation Regulation requires that “The originator, sponsor and SSPE involved in a securitisation considered STS shall be established in the Union”: Would this provision deemed to be fulfilled in the case of originators, sponsors and SSPEs established in an EEA country? Would it be deemed to be fulfilled in the case of an originator which is an EU branch of a subsidiary  established in an EEA State pertaining to a banking group established in the EU?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2017/2402 (SecReg)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Questions on final draft implementing technical standards (ITS) on Pillar 3 disclosures on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) risks - template 10

Should the timelines of template 10 align with the EU Taxonomy timelines? And is it allowed to report exposures in template 10 that later will be considered EU Taxonomy aligned?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Template 5 - Definition of time horizons

With regards to the Final draft implementing technical standards (ITS) on prudential disclosures on ESG risks in accordance with Article 449a CRR, specifically regarding Template 5 of related Annex XXXIX, could you specify 'time horizon'?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures

ITS ESG P3 - Template 4 - Top 20 emitting companies aggregation

Should reported exposures to top 20 most emitting companies be reported at a group or individual company level?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures

Template 10: other climate change mitigating actions - Columns d and e

Could you specify which kind of answers are expected under 'type of risk mitigated' (column d and e)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures

Template 2 - Row 5 subset

Template 2 of Annex XXXIX to the Final draft implementing technical standards on prudential disclosures on ESG risks in accordance with 449a CRR – Is row 5 a sub-set of rows 2/3/4?  

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures

C 34.08 – Reporting of received collateral

Regarding the columns pertaining to the ‘Fair value of collateral received’ of template C 34.08 of Annex 1 of Regulation (EU) 2021/451 (i.e. columns 0010 – 0040 and 0090 – 0130), both the general guidance for the template (paragraph 131) along with the specific guidance for these columns provided in Annex II state that the institution shall report the fair values of received collateral that is used in CCR exposures. Is the correct interpretation of the term ‘used in CCR exposures’, that only the portion of received collateral that is actually used to offset CCR exposures should be reported in C 34.08, and not the full original fair value of collateral received relating to CCR exposures?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Maturity floor in Standard Method for CVA

Shall a floor equal to 1 - according to Article 162(2)(b)CRR- be applied also for derivatives that are not subject to a master netting agreement? For example, if you have an exposure to a counterparty consisting of a single derivative not subject to a master netting agreement and expiring in 6 months, is the effective maturity to be entered equal to 0.5 or 1?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Reporting of SA exposures in IRB-CIU look-through

Do CIU exposures for which the IRB look-through approach is applied, but which are subject to the Standardised Approach for calculating the risk-weighted exposure amount as per Article 152(4), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, have to be reported in template C 07.00 (CR SA) or in the C 08 templates (CR IRB)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Return to non default status

Can any delay in payments be allowed in the context of the minimum conditions for reclassification to a non-defaulted status as stated in Section 7 of the EBA Guidelines on the new Definition of Default (DoD)? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2016/07 - Guidelines on the application of the definition of default under Article 178 CRR

Level 2A Assets market value in C 66.01 counterbalancing capacity section.

How should the market value of Level 2A Assets be reported in C66 Maturity Ladder in Section 3.4 Counterbalancing Capacity Level 2A Assets?  

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Evidences / Records to be stored by account servicing payment service providers (ASPSP) for payment initiation service (PIS) and account information service (AIS) requests

Shall ASPSP keep record of PIS requests received through a PISP and evidences on the authenticity and execution of these payment transactions when SCA is managed by ASPSP ?  Shall ASPSP keep record of the consent of the PSU and also of the AIS requests received through an AISP ? For both evidences is there any specific retention period ?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Disclosure of Template CR2 where NPE threshold of =>5% has not been breached

As per the mapping tool provided by the EBA, the Pillar 3 Disclosure Templates - 'CR2' is mapped to FinRep Template 24.1. This particular FinRep template is only reportable where the ratio of gross carrying amount of non-performing loans and advances divided by the total gross carrying amount of loans and advances subject to the definition of non-performing according to Article 47a of the CRR is equal to or higher than 5%. One therefore would assume that the 'CR2' Pillar 3 Disclosure template is not required unless the threshold is breached. However, Article 9 within the Pillar 3 ITS appears to imply that that 'CR2' is required regardless of the threshold by large institutions, as called out specifically as part of Point 1(e) of Article 9, This is also apparent in Point 3 of Article 9, where 'CR2' is not mentioned within the paragraph concerned as being a template that is determined for disclosure depending on the threshold. Can the EBA confirm the position on the same, given the requirement from the reporting perspective.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/637 - ITS with regard to disclosures of information referred to in Titles II and III of Part Eight CRR

Treatment of TIPS and IP in AE reporting

Should balances kept on accounts related to TIPS (TARGET Instant Payment Settlement) and IP (Instant payments) in the encumbrance reporting, be reported as encumbered or not?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Treatment of additional collateral on top of overcollateralization of Covered bond program

Should a surplus above overcollateralization (above contractual amounts/percentages and also above what rating agencies require to maintain the rating) within a covered bond programme be considered as encumbered, when release and re-assignment of any security requires a signature from external parties (incl. the trustee for the covered bond programme) based on the programme documentation? If the required signature before withdrawal should still be seen as resulting in encumbrance, also in the case of the situation described below, would it then be relevant, if the Trustee contractually would not be able to say ‘No’ if the after the requested withdrawal the required overcollateralization threshold are still met?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions