Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Maturity floor for SFT transactions under a master netting agreement that does not fulfill the enforceability criteria of CRR Article 206.

Does the EBA recognise that Securities Financing Transactions (SFT) conducted under an industry master netting agreement (MNA) such as GMRA or GMSLA could be subject to the 5-day floor maturity under CRR Article 162(2)(d) to the extend such MNA (i) meets the requirements of CRR Article 207 (2) to (4) on the eligibility of the collateral but (ii) does not necessarily fulfill the close-out netting enforceability criteria of Article 206 due to local law and absence of robust netting legislation for instance? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7397
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:

Multilateral development banks classification for the purpose of article 325ah

Buckets 2 and 11 of Table 4 in Article 325ah refer to the category of multilateral development banks (MDBs) and international organisations (IORGs) referred to in Article 117(2) or Article 118 of CRR. At the same time, paragraph 2 of the same article 325ah, requires the use of a classification that is commonly used in the market for grouping issuers by sector, in order to assign a risk exposure to a sector.  Assuming that such a market wide accepted classification would show a certain counterparty as an MDB, as long as this specific counterparty is not listed in the above listed articles mentioned for buckets 2 and 11 of Table 4 in Article 325ah (as a one to one match) , then this counterparty would need to be assigned to a different bucket, likely 4 or 13.  Can there be a departure from the specific list of MDBs and IORGs, as referred to in Article 117(2) or Article 118 of CRR, for the purpose of Table 4 in Article 325ah of CRR? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7391
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:

Financial Conglomerates: Mismatch between ITS and DPM 3.5 – ID v22748_u - T1 L 06.00, column c0020.

We are seeking clarification about a possible mismatch between ITS and DPM 3.5 (ID v22748_u - T1 L 06.00, column c0020) as part of the compilation of the template FC.06 Template - “Risk Concentration - Exposure by counterparties" within the FiCod. supervisory reporting. The Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2454 of 14 December 2022 states that, within the Template FC.06 - “Risk Concentration - Exposure by counterparties", the exposures must be reported for each individual legal entity belonging to the financial conglomerate, whereas the DPM 3.5 only permit reporting a unique value of the identification code of the external counterparty. This also determines the impossibility of representing separately the exposures held towards the same external counterparty but denominated in different currencies. We therefore ask what is the correct way to represent - inside the FC.06 Template- the cases in which multiple entities belonging to the conglomerate have exposures towards the same external counterparty and for the cases in which, for each external counterparty, there are exposures denominated in different currencies.

  • Legal act: Directive 2002/87/EC (FiCoD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2454 – ITS on the reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration for financial conglomerates
  • ID: 2025_7381
  • Topic: Financial conglomerates
  • Date of submission:

Correct classification of services related to the 'reselling' of software provided in SaaS mode

With reference to the correct identification of the type of ICT services, taking into account the types contained in ANNEX III of Regulation (EU) 2024/2956, how should services related to the 'reselling' of software provided in SaaS mode be classified?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2022/2554 (DORA Reg)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/2956 - ITS on the register of information
  • ID: 2025_7367
  • Topic: Register of information (DORA)
  • Date of submission:

Exposures to institutions waived from individual capital requirements according to article 7 CRR, under Credi Risk Standarised Approach

How should exposures to institutions be treated under Credi Risk Standarised Approach, if such institutions have been waived of individual capital requirements? Shall these exposures be assigned to grade C, or can the level of compliance with capital requirements be assessed by taking consolidated requirements as reference?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7363
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:

Calculation of the SME supporting factor for off-balance-sheet exposures

Is the SME supporting factor applicable, and if so, how shall it be computed, in case there is no on-balance-sheet exposure to be included in E*, as defined in Article 501(1) of CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7350
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:

Minimum monetary amount of professional indemnity insurance in ongoing supervision

Are points 5.4, 5.7, 5.10 and 7.4 of EBA/GL/2017/08 guideline applicable only while applying for authorisation or in ongoing supervision as well? Is 50 000 per indicator minimal amount after authorisation procedure/first year as well?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2017/08 - Guidelines on the criteria on how to stipulate the minimum monetary amount of the professional indemnity insurance
  • ID: 2025_7317
  • Topic: Monetary amount of the professional indemnity insurance
  • Date of submission:

The scope of the regulation described in Article 6 mismatches what is presented as an option in the Annex I, Part 2 of the same regulation

Do financial entities must include non-financial entities within the same group in the Register of Information? If not, why is there an option to do so?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2022/2554 (DORA Reg)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/2956 - ITS on the register of information
  • ID: 2025_7297
  • Topic: Register of information (DORA)
  • Date of submission:

Knowledge element of SCA.

Can an API key be considered as a Knowledge element of SCA?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2024_7286
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:

Proxy matrices

Are credit institutions (ASPSPs) allowed to facilitate proxy matrices implemented by their (corporate) clients that allocate proxy to only certain users to invoke the services of third party payment service providers (TPPs)?  

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2024_7265
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:

Obstacles Faced by PISPs in Accessing Payment Status Information Under PSD2

Are ASPSPs allowed to require PISPs to provide any additional identifier beyond what is specified in Article 35.4.b of the RTS in order to access information about the execution of a payment order?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2024_7261
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:

emission allowances

Sentence 2 of paragraph 3 of Annex II CRR refers to point (11) of Section C of Annex I MiFID, i.e. to emission allowances. Does that mean that spot market emission allowances are to be treated as derivative contracts listed in Annex II, even though they are not derivative in character?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7255
  • Topic: Other issues
  • Date of submission:

Use of credit assessments by ECAIs not in scope of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.

Can external credit assessments that have been issued by an ECAI, but were not publicly disclosed, be used to determine the risk weight of an exposure under the Standardised Approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7220
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:

Applying risk weight in accordance with Article 235(3) of CRR3

In case of exposure and guarantee denominated in different currencies, which currency shall be taken into account in the process of application of risk weight for guaranteed part of exposure in accordance with Article 235(3) of CRR3?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7213
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:

Treatment of bridge financing in the calculation of the risk weight (RW*)

As the objective of Article 132c (1) CRR, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/876 – CRR2, is to “calculate the risk-weighted exposure amount for their off-balance-sheet items with the potential to be converted into exposures (…)”, should the calculation of RW* actually exclude short-term liabilities (e.g. bridge financing)? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7189
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:

Payment service user - both payer and payee

Can a payment service user be both payer and payee on a money remittance service?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7184
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:

Own Funds Requirements before Securitisation (%) Ksa

Validation v11650_m states that for the positions reported in the C14.00 template that are not Covered Bonds or Other Liabilities, Own Funds Requirements before Securitisation (%) Ksa (c0223) should be reported. However, is this validation applicable if the positions are issuer loans (held to meet the securitisation risk retention requirements) and the very purpose of the issuer loan is to hold a 5% vertical slice – it is not subject to any credit trenching?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2023/2175 - RTS on the risk retention requirements for originators, sponsors, original lenders, and servicers
  • ID: 2024_7181
  • Topic: Securitisation and Covered Bonds
  • Date of submission:

CRR3 - ETV calculation

With the CRR3 application, can you please confirm us the way to calculate the ETV ratio?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7175
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:

Passporting procedure for CIs and EMIs issuing tokens under MICAR

Are articles 146 (for credit institutions) and 48(3) (for e-money institutions) to be interpreted as submitting credit institutions and e-money institutions issuing ART/EMT on a crossborder basis to comply with the existing passporting framework set for these categories of establishments respectively by directives 2013/36/EU and 2009/110/EC? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2023/1114 (MiCAR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7168
  • Topic: Other MiCAR topics
  • Date of submission: