Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • EU wide transparency exercise
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Pillar 3 data hub
      • Reporting
        • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
        • Integrated reporting
        • Joint Bank Reporting Committee (JBRC)
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Factsheets
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2025_7359 Calculation of COH according to Article 20 vs. Art. 12 (1) Subparagraph 2
Question ID
2025_7359
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 2019/2033 (IFR)
Topic
Capital requirements
Article
12
Paragraph
1
Subparagraph
2
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
n/a
Name of institution / submitter
Deutsche Bundesbank
Country of incorporation / residence
Germany
Type of submitter
Competent authority
Subject matter
Calculation of COH according to Article 20 vs. Art. 12 (1) Subparagraph 2
Question

How exactly does the calculation of COH, AUM, ASA, DTF, NPR and TCD on the basis of IFR Article 12 (1) Subparagraph 2 differ from the general method for calculation COH in IFR Article 20?

Background on the question

To clarify the problem, we take the calculation of COH as an example for all the above mentioned metrics.

Article 20 defines the details for the calculation of COH. Paragraph 1 specifies that COH shall be calculated as the rolling average of the value of the total daily client orders handled, measured throughout each business day over the previous six months excluding the three most recent months.

Article 12 defines the conditions for an investment firm to be qualified as small and not interconnected (Class 3). These conditions include the two limits for COH cash trades as well as derivatives. Art. 12 (1) Subparagraph 2 stipulates, that the amounts of COH to be calculated for the purposes of Art. 12 shall not be calculated according to the standard method of Article 20. Instead, it states that the amount of COH is calculated by using end-of-day values. 

Since the wording of this subparagraph isn’t exactly clear on how the calculation is to be done in detail, we don’t know how the method for calculation COH for the purpose of Article 12 differs from the standard method of Article 20.

As far as we see, there are two possible scenarios for how to interpret the provision:

  1. It means that for COH the investment firms shall monitor their value at the end of each business day and if the threshold of Art. 12(1) IFR is breached, the investment firm shall be class 2 within the timing set in Art. 12(3) and (4) IFR. Therefore, in theory, an investment firm may have a K-COH, calculated according to Art. 20 IFR, below the thresholds set in Art. 12(1) (b) IFR, but breach the threshold at the end of a given day, and thus become class 2 after three months “from the date on which the threshold was exceeded”, as stated in Art. 12 (3) subparagraph 2.
  2. The “end-of-day” provision may also be interpreted in conjunction with point (b) of Paragraph 1, thus reading that the frequency and methodology of the calculation do not change with reference to Art. 20 and only the extracted value (end-of-day instead of “throughout the business day”) is different. 

When comparing the two possible approaches, the second approach seems to be the more proportionate of the two.

Submission date
27/02/2025
Status
Question under review
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law.

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • Request access to documents
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive