- Question ID
-
2025_7588
- Legal act
- Directive 2014/17/EU (MCD)
- Topic
- Creditworthiness assessments
- Article
-
21
- Paragraph
-
1
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
Not applicable
- Type of submitter
-
Other
- Subject matter
-
Access to national credit databases for all EU creditors for both cross-border and domestic mortgage loan transactions
- Question
-
Should Article 21 MCD be interpreted as requiring a Member State to ensure that a credit database established in that Member State can be accessed also by creditors from a Member State other than the one where a credit database is located for the purpose of granting a mortgage loan to consumers and monitoring consumers’ compliance with the credit obligations over the life of the credit agreement?
- Background on the question
-
Article 21 of the Directive 2014/17/EU (the ‘Mortgage Credit Directive’) provides that ‘each Member State shall ensure access for all creditors from all Member States to databases used in that Member State for assessing the creditworthiness of consumers and for the sole purpose of monitoring consumers’ compliance with the credit obligations over the life of the credit agreement’ and ‘the conditions for such access shall be non-discriminatory’ without making any distinctions between cross-border or domestic credits.
However, recital 20 of the MCD states that ‘in order to ensure a consistent framework for consumers in the area of credit as well as to minimise the administrative burden for creditors and credit intermediaries, the core framework of this Directive should follow the structure of Directive 2008/48/EC where possible […]’ and ‘Similarly, non-discriminatory access for creditors to relevant credit databases should be ensured in order to achieve a level playing field with the provisions laid down in Directive 2008/48/EC".
It is therefore unclear whether access to databases under Article 21 MCD should be interpreted as covering only the origination and monitoring of cross-border credit transactions, or whether it also extends to domestic credit transactions, thus allowing creditors from a Member State other than the one where a credit database is located to access that database in relation to all their mortgage lending activities.
- Submission date
- Final publishing date
-
- Final answer
-
Article 21(1) of the Mortgage Credit Directive states that:
“Each Member State shall ensure access for all creditors from all Member States to databases used in that Member State for assessing the creditworthiness of consumers and for the sole purpose of monitoring consumers’ compliance with the credit obligations over the life of the credit agreement. The conditions for such access shall be non-discriminatory.”
The related Recital 60 reads:
“To prevent any distortion of competition among creditors, it should be ensured that all creditors, including credit institutions or non-credit institutions providing credit agreements relating to residential immovable property, have access to all public and private credit databases concerning consumers under non-discriminatory conditions. [...]”
Article 21 (1) MCD clearly requires each Member State to ensure non-discriminatory access “for all creditors from all Member States” to databases used in that Member State. The provision makes no distinction between cross-border and domestic credit transactions.
MCD states in Article 21 that the purpose of such access by any creditor operating in a Member State should be limited to the assessment of the creditworthiness of a consumer for the sole purpose of monitoring their compliance with the credit obligations over the life of the credit agreement. This means that Article 21 MCD does not allow a Member State to restrict the non-discriminatory access to databases to creditors active in the national territory or providing mortgage loans cross-border.
Moreover, Recital 60 MCD corresponding to Article 21 MCD further explains that to prevent any distortion to competition among creditors, all creditors should have access to all public and private credit databases concerning consumers under non-discriminatory conditions. Moreover, Recital 20 MCD, which is part of the first general recitals setting out justification, objectives and general principles of the Directive and recalls the importance of consistency with the framework of Directive 2008/48/EC (the Consumer Credit Directive) in order to ensure coherence and minimise the administrative burden, cannot restrict the scope of the rights and obligations laid down in an operative provision.
On this basis, the Commission considers that Article 21 of the Mortgage Credit Directive provides non-discriminatory access to all credit databases established in EU Member States for all mortgage credit providers authorised to operate in at least one EU Member State, irrespective of whether the provision of the credit is in the national territory or cross-border.
Disclaimer:
These answers clarify provisions already contained in the applicable legislation. They do not extend in any way the rights and obligations deriving from such legislation, nor do they introduce any additional requirements for the concerned operators and competent authorities. The answers are merely intended to assist natural or legal persons, including competent authorities and Union institutions and bodies in clarifying the application or implementation of the relevant legal provisions. Only the Court of Justice of the European Union is competent to authoritatively interpret Union law. The views expressed in the internal Commission Decision cannot prejudge the position that the European Commission might take before the Union and national courts.
- Status
-
Final Q&A
- Answer prepared by
-
Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law.
Disclaimer
The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.