- Question ID
-
2024_7103
- Legal act
- Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
- Topic
- Other topics
- Article
-
n.a.
- Paragraph
-
n.a.
- Subparagraph
-
n.a.
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- EBA/GL/2018/07 - Guidelines on the exemption from the contingency mechanism under Regulation (EU) 2018/389
- Article/Paragraph
-
33.7
- Type of submitter
-
Other
- Subject matter
-
Revocation of ASPSP's Exemption from the Contingency Mechanism due to Prolonged Service Disruption
- Question
-
In a scenario where an incident lasting more than two consecutive weeks preventing Payment Service Users (PSUs) from initiating their payments through a dedicated interface, considering that the Account Servicing Payment Service Provider (ASPSP) has an exemption from the contingency mechanism under Regulation (EU) 2018/389, and the National Competent Authority (NCA) has been notified about the incident:
Should the National Competent Authority (NCA) revoke the ASPSP's exemption from the contingency mechanism?
- Background on the question
-
The contingency measures, commonly referred to as a fallback mechanism, ensures that PSUs can continue to initiate payments and access account information in the event that the dedicated interface provided by the ASPSP becomes unavailable.
Under specific circumstances, ASPSPs may be granted an exemption from this requirement by the NCA. This exemption is contingent upon the ASPSP demonstrating that its dedicated interface meets stringent availability and performance criteria. However, if the dedicated interface fails for an extended period, the reliability of the ASPSP’s systems and its adherence to regulatory obligations come into question. In a scenario where an incident causes the dedicated interface to be unavailable for more than two consecutive weeks, this extended downtime presents significant challenges. Despite requesting the NCA to revoke the exemption, an evasive response where that does not address the issue, calls into question the objectivity of the Regulation.
In the light of a prolonged incident and its serious implications, in accordance with RTS (EU) 2018/389, specifically Article 33, which addresses the contingency measures for a dedicated interface, paragraph 7: “Competent authorities shall revoke the exemption referred to in paragraph 6 where the conditions (a) and (d) are not met by the account servicing payment service providers for more than 2 consecutive calendar weeks. Competent authorities shall inform EBA of this revocation and shall ensure that the account servicing payment service provider establishes, within the shortest possible time and at the latest within 2 months, the contingency mechanism referred to in paragraph 4.”
- Submission date
- Final publishing date
-
- Final answer
-
Article 33(7) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 specifies that competent authorities shall revoke the exemption from the obligation to set up the contingency mechanism where the conditions (i) for the dedicated interface to comply with all the obligations for dedicated interfaces set out in Article 32 and (ii) any problem related to the dedicated interface has not been resolved without undue delay, are not met by the account servicing payment service providers for more than two consecutive calendar weeks.
Accordingly, where an incident causes general unavailability of the dedicated interface of an account servicing payment service provider for more than two consecutive calendar weeks, while at the same time the interface made available to the payment service user for directly accessing its payment account online is available, the competent authority shall revoke the exemption from the obligation to set up the contingency mechanism under Article 33(6) of the Delegated Regulation.
- Status
-
Final Q&A
- Answer prepared by
-
Answer prepared by the EBA.
Disclaimer
The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.