Question ID
2024_7084
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 2023/1114 (MiCAR)
Topic
Scope and definitions (MiCAR)
Article
3
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
N/A
Name of institution / submitter
Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution
Country of incorporation / residence
France
Type of submitter
Competent authority
Subject matter
Qualification of crypto-asset service in case of exchange of electronic money tokens for other crypto-assets
Question

Should the service consisting in exchanging electronic money tokens for other crypto-assets be qualified as exchange of crypto-assets for crypto assets or as exchange of funds for crypto assets?

Background on the question

Crypto asset services providers (CASPs) will in the future provide the regulated service consisting in exchanging electronic money tokens for other crypto assets. 

However, due to the fact that electronic money tokens are a type of crypto-asset deemed to be electronic money (MICAR 48(2)), and that electronic money is to considered as “funds”, it is therefore not entirely clear if CASPs would, in this situation, exchange crypto-assets (understood as EMT) for crypto assets or exchange funds (i.e. EMT) for crypto assets.

This can have an impact on the compliance of said CASPs regarding payment regulation (PSD2) since if the collection of “funds” occur for a third party (in specific cases where the CASP acts as an intermediary between holders and liquidity providers for example), then CASPs would need to either be authorized under PSD2 or be registered as an agent under the same directive.

Hence, clarification as to whether or not EMT are to be  seen as funds or as crypto-assets in this situation is key to assess the overall compliance of CASPs’ business models 

Submission date
Status
Question under review
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law.