Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Pillar 3 data hub
      • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2022_6351 Calculation of the CET1 deduction for non-performing exposures (NPEs)
Question ID
2022_6351
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Own funds
Article
36 (1) m, 47a-c and 469a CRR
Paragraph
47c (1), (2), (3) and (4)
Subparagraph
47c (1) (a)
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
none
Name of institution / submitter
Regnology Germany GmbH
Country of incorporation / residence
Germany
Type of submitter
Consultancy firm
Subject matter
Calculation of the CET1 deduction for non-performing exposures (NPEs)
Question

Which date shall be used to determine the applicable factor that is used to calculate the amount determined in Article 47c(1)(a) CRR when the terms and conditions of a non-performing exposure, which was originated prior to 26 April 2019, have been modified by the institution in a way that increased the institution's exposure to the obligor and  the counterparty defaulted before the initial origination of the exposure?

The date on which the counterparty initially defaulted or the date on which the exposure was initially originated or the date on which the terms and conditions of the NPE have been modified by the institution in a way that increased the institution's exposure to the obligor?    

Additionally, which date is supposed to be considered if the default of the exposure/counterparty occurs after the initial date of origination of the exposure and before an increase in amount of exposure? The date of default or the modification date?

Background on the question

Article 36 (1) (m) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) states that the amount of insufficient coverage for non-performing exposures (NPEs) shall be deducted from the Common Equity Tier 1 items of the institution. 

Article 47c CRR lays out the method of calculating the NPE CET1 deduction for exposures that are classified as non-performing according  to the definition of non-performing given in Article 47a and 47b. 

Article 469a(1) CRR exempts exposures from the provisions stated before if they originated prior to the 26 April 2019. 

Article 469a(2) CRR exempts exposures from the exemption of Article 469a(1) CRR if the terms and conditions of a non-performing exposure, which was originated prior to 26 April 2019, have been modified by the institution in a way that increased the institution's exposure to the obligor. These positions shall be considered as having been originated on the date when the modification applies. 

 

While it is stated clearly that institutions shall only calculate a CET1 deduction for positions that either originated on or after 26 April 2019 or that originated before this date but have been increased afterwards, the regulation does not give an unambiguous answer to the question of which date shall be used to determine the applicable factor according to Article 47c(2) – (4) CRR. 

 

The relevance of the question arises since the amount of insufficient coverage can vary strongly depending on the applicable factor and hence on the date that is used to determine the factor. 

 

We have considered the following different answers and rationales:

  1. The initial date of default shall be used because it is the regulators intent that the applicable factor reflects the risk that is caused by an exposure which increases with the amount of time forgone since the default. 

 

  1. An exposure cannot become non-performing before its date of origination. The exposure became non-performing on the day of its origination because the partner had already been defaulted on that day. However, to reflect the risk caused by the exposure more truly, the initial date of origination and not the modification date shall be considered. 

 

  1. An exposure cannot become non-performing before its date of origination.

Art. 469a (2) CRR states that modified exposures shall be considered as having been originated on the date when the modification applies. Hence the date of modification shall be considered for the determination of the applicable factor. 

 

The rationale behind proposed answer C) seems to be directly plausible, however it can also foster regulatory arbitrage through forbearance measures which otherwise would not be granted. 

Submission date
02/02/2022
Status
Question under review
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law.

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive