- Question ID
-
2016_2952
- Legal act
- Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
- Topic
- Resolution tools and powers
- Article
-
44
- Paragraph
-
5
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
n.a.
- Type of submitter
-
Competent authority
- Subject matter
-
Application of 8% requirement to group resolution
- Question
-
Should the contribution to loss absorption and recapitalisation be calculated with reference to the liabilities of the holding company being bailed in, or the liabilities of the failing subsidiary or subsidiaries?
- Background on the question
-
Article 44(5) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) requires that the resolution financing arrangement may only make a contribution for the purposes of loss-absorption or recapitalisation where “[…] (a) a contribution to loss absorption and recapitalisation equal to an amount not less than 8 % of the total liabilities including own funds of the institution under resolution, measured at the time of resolution action in accordance with the valuation provided for in Article 36, has been made by the shareholders and the holders of other instruments of ownership, the holders of relevant capital instruments and other bail-inable liabilities through write down, conversion or otherwise”;.
Article 44(5) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) does however not clarify how this requirement shall be applied in relation to a group resolution? In such cases, a subsidiary or subsidiaries may be failing, and the resolution powers are exercised towards the holding company (in accordance with Article 33). There is a question as to whether, in these cases, the contribution to loss absorption and recapitalisation should be calculated with a reference to the liabilities of the holding company being bailed in, or the liabilities of the failing subsidiary or subsidiaries. One of both possibilities mentioned should be applied: Article 44 (5) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) should be interpreted as referring to either the liabilities of the holding company, or the liabilities of the failing subsidiary or subsidiaries.
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
Please note that as part of adjustments to the Single Rulebook Q&A process, agreed by the EBA and the European Commission, it has been decided to reject outstanding questions submitted before 1 January 2020, when the Q&A process was updated as part of the last ESAs Review. In particular, the question that you have submitted has now regrettably been rejected and will not be addressed.
If you believe your question would still benefit from clarification, you are invited to resubmit your question, adapting it to reflect any legislative, regulatory or other relevant developments that may have occurred since the initial date of submission. The EBA will aim to address resubmitted questions as a matter of priority. When considering to resubmit, you are kindly requested to observe the updated admissibility criteria agreed in the context of the adjustment of the Q&A process, available in the Additional background and guidance for asking questions. We hope for your understanding.
For further information please refer to the press release and the updated Q&A page.
- Status
-
Rejected question