- Question ID
-
2016_2827
- Legal act
- Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
- Topic
- MREL
- Article
-
45 (3)
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
Not applicated
- Type of submitter
-
Credit institution
- Subject matter
-
MREL calculation on a consolidated basis
- Question
-
Should a Mortgage Credit Institution that is subject to an individual exemption to MREL requirements (according to BRRD Article 45(3)) and owned 100% by an EU Parent Institution be excluded from the calculation of MREL on a consolidated basis?
- Background on the question
-
I. Background:
The EU Parent Institution is a systemically important bank an EU Member State.The Mortgage Credit Institution is:
- 100% owned by the Parent Institution;
- subject to the exemption from the obligation to meet MREL on individual level according to BRRD Article 45(3);
- is not a creditor of the EU Parent Institution.
The EU Parent Institution is obliged to meet MREL on consolidated level (BRRD Article 45(8)), as it is Union parent institution.II. Considering that:
BRRD – Recital (80) – states that: “This Directive adopts a ‘top down’ approach to the determination of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) within a group. The approach further recognises that resolution action is applied at the level of the individual legal person, and that it is imperative that loss-absorbing capacity is located in, or accessible to, the legal person within the group in which losses occur. To that end, resolution authorities should ensure that loss-absorbing capacity within a group is distributed across the group in accordance with the level of risk in its constituent legal persons. The minimum requirement necessary for each individual subsidiary should be separately assessed. Furthermore, resolution authorities should ensure that all capital and liabilities which are counted towards the consolidated minimum requirement are located in entities where losses are liable to occur, or are otherwise available to absorb losses. This Directive should allow for a multiple-point-of-entry or a single-point-of-entry resolution. The MREL should reflect the resolution strategy which is appropriate to a group in accordance with the resolution plan. In particular, the MREL should be required at the appropriate level in the group in order to reflect a multiple-point-of-entry approach or single-point-of-entry-approach contained in the resolution plan […]”and
the “EBA FINAL Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on criteria for determining the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities under Directive 2014/59/EU” – Article 2(2) – states that: “Where the resolvability assessment concludes that liquidation of the institution under normal insolvency proceedings is feasible and credible, the recapitalisation amount shall be zero […]”
and
BRRD, Article 45(3) states that: “Notwithstanding paragraph 1, resolution authorities shall exempt mortgage credit institutions financed by covered bonds which, according to national law are not allowed to receive deposits from the obligation to meet, at all times, a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities, as: (a) those institutions will be wound-up through national insolvency procedures, or other types of procedure implemented in accordance with Article 38, 40 or 42 of this Directive, provided for those institutions; and (b) such national insolvency procedures, or other types of procedure, will ensure that creditors of those institutions, including holders of covered bonds where relevant, will bear losses in a way that meets the resolution objectives.”
- Submission date
- Final answer
-
A Mortgage Credit Institution which meets the requirements of Article 45(3) BRRD is subject to the exemption from MREL on an individual basis according to this provision. This reflects the fact that the mortgage subsidiary would not be subject to resolution under the BRRD on a standalone basis.
However, there is no specific exclusion from the consolidated MREL of assets and liabilities resulting from subsidiaries that are mortgage institutions. On the contrary, to the extent that the group holds exposures on the mortgage activity, and considering that there is no guarantee that no losses might be passed on from the mortgage subsidiary to the parent and subsequently cause the failure of the group, there is justification for including mortgage exposures and liabilities in the MREL calculation if they are also included in the prudential consolidation.
Disclaimer:
This question goes beyond matters of consistent and effective application of the regulatory framework. A Directorate General of the Commission (Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union) has prepared the answer, albeit that only the Court of Justice of the European Union can provide definitive interpretations of EU legislation. This is an unofficial opinion of that Directorate General, which the European Banking Authority publishes on its behalf. The answers are not binding on the European Commission as an institution. You should be aware that the European Commission could adopt a position different from the one expressed in such Q&As, for instance in infringement proceedings or after a detailed examination of a specific case or on the basis of any new legal or factual elements that may have been brought to its attention.
- Status
-
Archive
- Answer prepared by
-
Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law.
- Note to Q&A
-
Update 26.03.2021: This Q&A has been archived in light of the changes introduced in Article 45a(2) in Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD).