Some validation rules involve cells that, if they were reported, could violate checks fixed. For example:

v2955_m (related to col 070; {r230} = {r190} + {r210}).

This quality check considers the cells “F_36.01, row 190, col 70” and “F_36.01, row 210, col 70” that were mapped with the same data point of the “F 32.01, r060, c 020” and “F 32.01, r060, c 070” ones for which it is not allowed collecting any data on a consolidated basis, according to EU Regulation 79/2015. If an entity reports any data for row 230 but nothing for 190 and 210 rows, this check will be violated.

v2953_m; (related to col 070; {r200} <= {r190}).

This quality check considers the cell “F_36.01, row 190, col 70” that was mapped with the same data point of “F 32.01, r060, c 020" one for which it is not allowed collecting any data on a consolidated basis, according to EU Regulation 2015/79

v2909_m (related to col 070; {F 36.01.c, r190} = sum({F 36.01.a, (r010, r030, r050, r070, r090, r110, r130, r150, r170)})).

This quality check considers the cell “F_36.01, row 190, col 70” that was mapped with the same data point of “F 32.01, r060, c 020"" one for which it is not allowed collecting any data on a consolidated basis, according to EU Regulation 2015/79

v2808_m (related to col 20; {r060} <= {r040})

If an entity reports data for the template coordinates "F_36.01, row 190, col 70", this validation rules will be violated. Actually it should be necessary to report data for the cell "F_32.01, r060, c 020" to fit this validation rule, although it is not allowed to do this according the EU Reg. 2015/79

v2829_m (related to col 20; {r180} <= {r160})

If an entity reports data for the template coordinates "F_36.02, row 190, col 70" this validation rules will be violated. Actually it should be necessary to report data for the cell "F_32.02, r180, c 020" to fit this validation rule, although it is not allowed to do this according the EU Reg. 2015/79.

Moreover, we kindly ask you further clarifications for the following issues, strictly connected to what we mentioned above.

• "F_36.01, row 190, col 50" “Total encumbered assets - Debt Securities - of which: covered bonds - of which: issued by other entities of the group” This cell was mapped with the same data point of "F 32.01, r050, c 020" Should be prohibited collecting data related to "F_36.01, row 190, col 50" on a consolidated basis?
• "F_36.01, row 190, col 70" “Total encumbered assets - Debt Securities - of which: asset-backed securities - of which: issued by other entities of the group” This cell was mapped with the same data point of "F 32.01, r060, c 020". Should be prohibited collecting data related to ""F_36.01, row 190, col 70"" on a consolidated basis?
• "F_36.01 row 210, col 50" “Total non-encumbered Assets - Debt Securities - of which: covered bonds - of which: issued by other entities of the group” This cell was mapped with the same data point of "F 32.01, r050, c 070". Should be prohibited collecting data related to ""F_36.01 row 210, col 50"" on a consolidated basis?
• "F_36.01 row 210, col 70" “Total non -encumbered collateral received - Debt Securities - of which: asset-backed securities - of which: issued by other entities of the group” This cell was mapped with the same data point of "F 32.01, r060, c 070". Should be prohibited collecting data related to ""F_36.01 row 210, col 70"" on a consolidated basis?
• "F_36.02 row 190, col 50" “Total encumbered collateral received - Debt Securities - of which: covered bonds - of which: issued by other entities of the group” This cell was mapped with the same data point of "F 32.02, r170, c 020". Should be prohibited collecting data related to "F_36.02 row 190, col 50" on a consolidated basis?
• "F_36.02, row 190, col 70" “Total encumbered collateral received - Debt Securities - of which: asset-backed securities - of which: issued by other entities of the group” This cell was mapped with the same data point of "F 32.02, r180, c 020". Should be prohibited collecting data related to "F_36.02 row 190, col 50" on a consolidated basis?