- Question ID
-
2016_2811
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Credit risk
- Article
-
116
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
NA
- Name of institution / submitter
-
Finantsinspektsioon
- Country of incorporation / residence
-
Estonia
- Type of submitter
-
Competent authority
- Subject matter
-
Assignment of exposures to exposure class of Public Sector Entities
- Question
-
Can only the entities having legal forms of non-profit associations and foundations qualify as PSE-s and be assigned to exposure class of PSEs, or could PSEs also include legal forms of either public or private limited liability companies, which are either owned by or set up and sponsored by central governments, regional governments or local authorities and are under public supervision?
- Background on the question
-
According to Article 4(1)(8) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) public sector entities (PSE) are defined as non-commercial bodies. Therefore, it is unclear whether only the entities having legal forms of non-profit associations and foundations can qualify as PSEs and be assigned to exposure class of PSEs, or whether PSEs could also include legal forms of either public or private limited liability companies, which are either owned by or set up and sponsored by central governments, regional governments or local authorities and are under public supervision.
Article 116 CRR states risk weights for exposures to PSEs. According to the definition PSEs should be non-commercial bodies. There are companies in Estonia, owned by central or regional governments, exercising same responsibilities as non-commercial bodies but formed and regulated under the Commercial Code. For example, there are hospitals, owned, set up and sponsored by central governments or local governments, some of them are foundations by legal form and some are limited liability companies.
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
Please note that as part of adjustments to the Single Rulebook Q&A process, agreed by the EBA and the European Commission, it has been decided to reject outstanding questions submitted before 1 January 2020, when the Q&A process was updated as part of the last ESAs Review. In particular, the question that you have submitted has now regrettably been rejected and will not be addressed.
If you believe your question would still benefit from clarification, you are invited to resubmit your question, adapting it to reflect any legislative, regulatory or other relevant developments that may have occurred since the initial date of submission. The EBA will aim to address resubmitted questions as a matter of priority. When considering to resubmit, you are kindly requested to observe the updated admissibility criteria agreed in the context of the adjustment of the Q&A process, available in the Additional background and guidance for asking questions. We hope for your understanding.
For further information please refer to the press release and the updated Q&A page.
- Status
-
Rejected question