Question ID
2015_2401
Legal act
Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
Article
78
Paragraph
2
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions (for benchmarking the internal approaches)
Article/Paragraph
Article 2 Par.1, Annex III - Table C.103 - Column 010
Type of submitter
Credit institution
Subject matter
Portfolio ID Unique Row Identifier in template C 103.00
Question

Is column 010, Portfolio ID, of table C.103, supposed to be unique for each row in the table C.103, as per Annex IV? Or rather, it is the unique Portfolio ID as provided in column 010 of table 103 of Annex I, without being a unique row identifier in table C.103 as per Annex IV?

Background on the question

The instruction in Annex IV for table C.103, column 010 mentions that the Portfolio ID code "is a row identifier and shall be unique for each row in the table". While we acknowledge that each portfolio shall be uniquely identified with a code as provided in column 010 of table 103 of Annex I, for the purposes of table C.103 as per Annex IV, where we have to show on separate rows the different ratings for each portfolio, we consider that the information in column 010 of table C.103 as per Annex IV cannot be considered by itself a unique row identifier in that table.

Submission date
Final answer

The portfolio ID (column 010) is a code assigned by the EBA to each portfolio. This code is a row identifier and shall be unique for each row in the template C 103.00 of Annex IV of Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting for Institutions for benchmarking the internal approaches (ITS on benchmarking).

 

DISCLAIMER:

The present Q&A on Supervisory reporting is provisional. It will be reviewed after the Implementing Regulation is in force and published in the Official Journal, which may differ from the text of the draft ITS to which this Q&A relates.

Status
Archive
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the EBA.
Note to Q&A

Update 26.03.2021: This Q&A has been archived in the light of the most recent amendments to the ITS 2016/2070 on Supervisory Benchmarking.