- Question ID
-
2014_1687
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Own funds
- Article
-
63
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
N/A
- Name of institution / submitter
-
Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution
- Country of incorporation / residence
-
France
- Type of submitter
-
Competent authority
- Subject matter
-
Own funds - underwriting of own funds instruments
- Question
-
Is the underwriting of a Tier 2 (T2) instrument by an insurance subsidiary of the issuer possible when the instrument is then replaced in units of account within life insurance policies where the client bears the economic risk?
- Background on the question
-
French life insurance policies usually offer to their clients to invest their money either in cash (euro funds) or in units of account (= investment in different markets, equity, bonds, etc.). Unless in some cases, there is no capital guarantee in case the client chose to invest in units of account. The client takes then the economic risk related to his investment. An insurance subsidiary of a bank would like to underwrite a T2 instrument of its parent company in order to place it on its clients’ units of account. It seems to us that this would not be CRR compliant for the following reasons: - From a legal point of view, the insurance subsidiary remains the owner of the instrument placed in units of account. This goes against Article 63(b) CRR which prohibits the subscription of a T2 instrument by a subsidiary or any undertaking in which the institution has participation in the form of ownership, direct or by way of control, of 20% or more of the voting rights or capital of that undertaking; - The parent bank suggests to commit to buyback the part of the instrument for market making purposes in case the client ask reimbursement of its instrument and the insurance company is not able to replace the instrument in another client’s account (according to the bank, very rare cases). However, this would go against Article 63(k) CRR which prohibits the issuer to explicitly or implicitly indicate that the instrument would or might be repurchased other than in insolvency or liquidation. Moreover, this kind of buyback cannot be treated as market making purchases, as the instrument would be cancelled and not sold back to the market. - If we consider that the client is the owner of the instrument, from an economic point of view, then it would go against Article 63(i) which requires that all call options are exercisable only at the sole discretion of the issuer. However the underwriting would be possible by a subsidiary or branch as long as the instrument is immediately replaced in the market and subscribed by an external investor. The instrument is not taken into account in the parent company’s own funds as long as the instrument is not resold. Similarly, an insurance company could place a T2 instrument in units of account of its clients’ life insurance policies as long as this insurance company is not the subsidiary of the issuer, or an undertaking on which the issuer has participation in the form of ownership, direct or by way of control, of 20% or more of the voting rights or capital.
- Submission date
- Final publishing date
-
- Final answer
-
In accordance with Article 63(b) of the CRR, capital instruments underwritten by a subsidiary or an undertaking in which the issuer has a participation in the form of ownership, direct or by way of control, of 20% or more of the voting rights or capital cannot count towards the issuer’s own funds as long as they are not resold by the underwriter to an external investor.
Following the above, the underwriting of a Tier 2 instrument of an institution by an insurance subsidiary, which places the instrument in unit-linked funds within life insurance policies, would result in disqualification of the Tier 2 instrument from the issuer’s Own Funds, as long as the insurance subsidiary remains the legal owner of the instrument. The fact that the beneficial ownership in the instrument (i.e. the economic risk) is transferred to investors in the unit-linked funds is irrelevant for the purpose of Article 63(b) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR), which is concerned with the legal ownership.
- Status
-
Final Q&A
- Answer prepared by
-
Answer prepared by the EBA.
- Note to Q&A
-
Update 26.03.2021: This Q&A has been reviewed in the light of the changes introduced to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) and continues to be relevant.
Disclaimer
The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.