Question ID:
2014_706
Legal Act:
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic:
Operational risk
Article:
323
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations:
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph:
4.1.2 of Annex II
Disclose name of institution / entity:
Yes
Name of institution / submitter:
Banque Delubac & Cie
Country of incorporation / residence:
France
Type of submitter:
Credit institution
Subject Matter:
Taking into account insurance effect on operational risk
Question:

Recital 52 of Regulation 575/2013/EU (CRR) suggests insurance should be taken into account for the determination of own funds requirements with respect to operational risks, including in simple approaches. How can insurance be taken into account in the basic indicator and standardised approaches of operational risk?

Background on the question:

Insurance has a real and effective impact on operational risk. However, Article 323 of the CRR, which allows institutions to take into account such insurance to the extent competent authorities allow, seems to only apply to the advanced measurement approaches, as it is located in a chapter devoted to the advanced measurement approaches. This creates an incentive for small- and middle-sized institutions to reduce their insurance coverage, as it has no effect on their own funds requirements while reducing their own funds from the regular payment of premiums which are proportional to said coverage. Whether they do so or not, this will have an adverse effect on the diversity of the European banking system, strongly inciting mergers and thus the emergence of additional systemic risk.

Date of submission:
03/01/2014
Published as Final Q&A:
14/03/2014
Final Answer:

Insurance can be recognised as a mitigant for operational risk only under the Advanced Measurement Approach.

 

DISCLAIMER:

This question goes beyond matters of consistent and effective application of the regulatory framework. A Directorate General of the Commission (Directorate General for Internal Market and Services) has prepared the answer, albeit that only the Court of Justice of the European Union can provide definitive interpretations of EU legislation. This is an unofficial opinion of that Directorate General, which the European Banking Authority publishes on its behalf. The answers are not binding on the European Commission as an institution. You should be aware that the European Commission could adopt a position different from the one expressed in such Q&As, for instance in infringement proceedings or after a detailed examination of a specific case or on the basis of any new legal or factual elements that may have been brought to its attention.

Status:
Final Q&A
Answer prepared by:
Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law.
Note to Q&A:

Update 26.03.2021: This Q&A has not yet been reviewed by the European Commission in the light of the changes introduced to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR).

Image CAPTCHA