Question ID
2013_562
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
Article
99
Paragraph
3
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
Article/Paragraph
Annex III, F 19.01
Name of institution / submitter
Swedish Bankers' Association
Country of incorporation / residence
Sweden
Type of submitter
Industry association
Subject matter
Identifying the forborne exposures
Question

What are the approaches, which are being considered in identifying the forborne exposures, as well as exposures under probation? (i.e. IT, manual). How will the 2 year probation period for the forborne exposures be managed for the exposures which are classified as forborne, and which are no longer non-performing? Are they required to be reported separately within table 18?

Background on the question

What are the approaches, which are being considered in identifying the forborne exposures, as well as exposures under probation? (i.e. IT, manual). How will the 2 year probation period for the forborne exposures be managed for the exposures which are classified as forborne, and which are no longer non-performing? Are they required to be reported separately within table 18?

Submission date
Final publishing date
Final answer

The Final Draft ITS on Supervisory reporting on forbearance and non-performing exposures is not prescriptive on the methodologies and approaches institutions may apply to identify forborne exposures, and they remain free to implement those they deem the most appropriate to comply with the requirements in the definition.

As per paragraph 176 (b) to be included in Annex V part 2 of Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 – ITS on Supervisory Reporting of institutionsthe Draft ITS on Supervisory reporting according to EBA Final Draft ITS on Supervisory reporting on forbearance and non-performing exposures, the probation period starts only when a forborne exposure becomes performing. Exposures that are classified as forborne but are no longer non-performing should therefore be reported in column 050 of template F 19.00. In template F 18.00, these exposures should be reported as performing in column 020 as well as in the appropriate column between 030 and 050.

 

*As of 1/8/2014 the content of this answer was modified to reflect the publication of the final ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions in the Official Journal of the European Union. As a result, the references to the ITS were updated and the disclaimer deleted. For reasons of transparency, revisions are highlighted in track changes.

 

DISCLAIMER:

The present Q&A on Supervisory reporting is provisional. It will be reviewed after the respective Implementing Regulation is in force and published in the Official Journal, which may differ from the text of the relevant draft ITS to which it relates.

Status
Final Q&A
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the EBA.

Disclaimer

The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.