Question ID:
2013_333
Legal Act:
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic:
Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
Article:
99
Paragraph:
2
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations:
Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (as amended)
Article/Paragraph:
Annex III, F 40.01 column 010 and Annex I, C 06.00 column 025
Disclose name of institution / entity:
Yes
Name of institution / submitter:
Swedish Bankers' Association
Country of incorporation / residence:
Sweden
Type of submitter:
Industry association
Subject Matter:
Missing LEI code
Question:

What should be reported in column 010 in table F 40.01 Annex III and in column 025 in table C 06.00 Annex I, if LEI code is missing for an entity? Should the cell be left empty?

Background on the question:

LEI codes could be missing for some entities.

Date of submission:
04/10/2013
Published as Final Q&A:
07/03/2014
Final Answer:

When the LEI (or pre-LEI) code of the investee is missing, {F 40.01, c010} will be left empty but {F 40.01, c020} should be necessarily filled to provide the alternative code used to identify the investee (e.g. national identification code).

As a system of pre-LEI codes already exists, when a pre-LEI code (which is assigned by a recognised pre-LOU) exists for a given investee, it should be used in {F 40.01, c010} to identify that investee. This would prepare for the full implementation of the LEI system since the pre-LEI codes, as long as they are assigned by a recognised pre-LOU, will become LEI codes. The same applies to column 025 in COREP template C 06.00 regarding entities within the consolidated group and to column 030 in Large Exposure template C 27.00 regarding the identification of counterparties.

Status:
Final Q&A
Answer prepared by:
Answer prepared by the EBA.
Image CAPTCHA