PeerreviewMethodology15102007.pdf
Peer review: Methodology
Peer review: Methodology
IWCFC’s Recommendations to Address the Consequences of the Differences in Sectoral Rules on the Calculation of Own Funds of Financial Conglomerates – Draft for consultation Positions of the German Insurance Association
CEBS PROPOSAL FOR A COMMON EU DEFINITION OF TIER 1 HYBRIDS
IMA response to consultation on amendments to the guidelines on common reporting
First part of CEBS technical advice to the European Commission on own funds - Survey of the implementation of the current rules on own funds across Member States
N/A
CP07a draft guidelines on mapping ECAI’s credit assessments of CIUs
Response to CP16: Second Consultation Paper on CEBS’ Technical Advice to the European Commission on the Review of the Large Exposure Rules
CEBS consultation on Financial Reporting
Consultation Paper on the High Level Principles on Outsourcing
REPLY OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION BY THE COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN BANKING SUPERVISORS (CEBS) ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORTING FRAMEWORK FOR CREDIT INSTITUTIONS
CEBS' second round of consultation on the validation and assessment of credit and operational risk approaches
Standpoint of the Czech National Bank and the Czech Banking Association on the guidelines for implementing a common European framework for supervisory disclosure (CP05)
Overview of hybrids Instruments eligible as original own fundsMain characteristics
RESPONSE OF IRISH BANKERS FEDERATION TO CEBS CONSULTATION PAPER ON FINANCIAL REPORTING
European Savings Banks Group (ESBG) Response to CEBS Consultation Paper 12 (CP12) on Stress testing under the Supervisory Review Process
Austrian Federal Economic Chamber
Overview of the use of exemptions contained in Article 113 (3) across the EU
Innovative instruments as of 31 December 2006
Recommendations to address the consequences of the differences in sectoral rules on the calculation of own funds of financial conglomerates