Validation rule v903576_m_3 requires that the absolute value of the total risk amount equals the sum of the absolute values of its components. 

v903576_m_3: abs({J_02.00,r0200,c0060,}) = abs({J_02.00,r0220,c0060,}) + abs({J_02.00,r0230,c0060,}) + abs({J_02.00,r0240,c0060,}) + abs({J_02.00,r0270,c0060,}) + abs({J_02.00,r0310,c0060,}) + abs({J_02.00,r0350,c0060,}) + abs({J_02.00,r0390,c0060,}) + abs({J_02.00,r0420,c0060,}) + abs({J_02.00,r0470,c0060,}) + abs({J_02.00,r0510,c0060,})

In practice, situations arise where individual components include both positive and negative values (e.g. due to different sensitivities of assets and liabilities under certain scenarios).

For example, in a parallel upward shock scenario, projected interest cash flows for floating-rate instruments may increase more than the reduction in present value due to higher discount rates, resulting in positive and negative contributions across line items. 

In such cases, strict equality between the absolute aggregate and the sum of absolute components may not hold, leading to recurring validation errors despite economically consistent results.

Clarification is requested as to whether:

• such outcomes are consistent with the ITS framework, and
• the validation rule is expected to be applied strictly or adapted in future taxonomy releases.