Question ID
2026_7769
Legal act
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Topic
BRRD Reporting
Article
11
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Regulation (EU) 2025/2303 - ITS on Resolution Planning Reporting
Article/Paragraph
Annex II
Type of submitter
Credit institution
Subject matter
Inconsistencies between ITS on resolution planning reporting versus Annotated Table Layout DPM 4.2, RESOL1 and RESOL2
Question

Could you please align the technical requirements stated in the Annotated Table Layout in the DPM 4.2 module (20260106 Annotated Table Layout RES 4.2 RESOL1RES 4.2.xls) with the requirements as stated in the ITS (Annex II: Instructions) on Z11.00, column 0100 Currency (as well in Z12.00 column 0090, Z13.00 column 0060, Z14.00 column 0120, Z17.00 column 0100, Z09.01 columns 0150-0200)? 

Background on the question

According to the Annex II (II.31), for reporting on Currency (column 0100) in Z11.00, the 3-letter ISO 4217 code is required. However, in the technical requirements as specified in the Annotated Table Layout, the full currency name is requested instead of the ISO code. The same inconsistency is reflected in other Z-templates as well: this relates to Z12.00 column 0090, Z13.00 column 0060, Z14.00 column 0120, Z17.00 column 0100, Z09.01 columns 0150-0200, applicable sections in Annex II are: II.32, II.33, II.34, II.37, II.26.

Submission date
Rejected publishing date
Rationale for rejection

This question has been rejected because the matter it refers to has already been identified and will be considered for a forthcoming version of the Reporting framework / release of the respective validation rules.

Status
Rejected question