- Question ID
-
2026_7743
- Legal act
- Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
- Topic
- Resolution plans
- Article
-
11
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Regulation (EU) 2025/2303 - ITS on Resolution Planning Reporting
- Article/Paragraph
-
Annex II - II.2.1
- Type of submitter
-
Credit institution
- Subject matter
-
Reporting of multiple investees per investor in template Z_01.02 (Ownership structure)
- Question
-
In template Z_01.02, how should institutions report cases where one investor is linked to more than one investee, given that column 0020 (code of investor) is defined as the Key value and columns 0040 and 0050 identify the investee?
- Background on the question
-
Template Z_01.02 provides an overview of the legal and ownership structure of the group. According to Regulation (EU) 2025/2303 - ITS on Resolution Planning Reporting, the template shall include all shareholders (or equivalents) of group entities holding more than 2% of the share capital (or equivalent) or voting rights, as well as participations (or equivalents) held by group entities.
In DPM 4.2, column 0020 (code of investor) is indicated as the Key value. The definition of Key value states that "the key value or the combination of all key value columns, where more than one applies must uniquely specify each row". At the same time, column 0050 (Code of investee) is used to identify the investee.
In practice, situations frequently arise where one investor is linked to more than one investee within the group.
For example, Investor A may hold participations above 2% threshold in Entity B and Entity C. In such cases, uncertainty arises as to how the requirement that the Key value must uniquely specify each row should be applied, given that the template also requires the identification of each investee through dedicated columns.This raises the question of whether:
- each investor-investee relationship should be reported in a separate row, repeating the investor in columns 0010-0020 and identifying each investee separately in colum 0040-0050;
- the information on multiple investees linked to the same investor should be aggregated in a single row.
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
This question has been rejected because EBA guidance or clarification is not needed. This can be the case where harmonisation of practices through the Q&A process is not considered necessary; or that the issue is not material, for example because it is considered to be relevant only to a limited set of institutions or other stakeholders.
- Status
-
Rejected question