- Question ID
-
2026_7737
- Legal act
- Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
- Topic
- BRRD Reporting
- Article
-
Annex II
- Paragraph
-
Z 06.00
- Subparagraph
-
Column 0030 - DGS
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Regulation (EU) 2025/2303 - ITS on Resolution Planning Reporting
- Article/Paragraph
-
ANNEX II
- Type of submitter
-
Other
- Subject matter
-
Inconsistency between ITS and Taxonomy
- Question
-
In the Annex II of the ITS for report Z0600, Column 0030 - DGS , the ITS clearly states that the value other can be reported :"If the officially recognised DGS of which the entity is member is not listed above, ‘oter shall be reported".
But the DPM 4.2 as a restriction fur such column based on subcateogy EN3 which does not allow any "other" value and just nammed the principal DGS to be used.
In the previous version of the DPM, the DGS column was technically binded by another enumeration that was allowing an other value : x128 - Other deposit guarantee scheme.
Can you explain us :
- if it's normal that the DPM 4.2 is now excluding the Other value even if the ITS seems to say that it's a valid option
- if it's correct for a client for which some CI may used some DGS not listed in the subcateroy EN3, to let this column empty?
- Background on the question
-
Annex II - Z0600 - COlumn 0030 : "If the officially recognised DGS of which the entity is member is not listed above, ‘oter shall be reported".
DPM 4.2 Annotated templates & Dictionnary
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
This question has been rejected because the matter it refers to has already been identified and will be considered for a forthcoming version of the Reporting framework / release of the respective validation rules.
- Status
-
Rejected question