- Question ID
-
2025_7341
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 2022/2554 (DORA Reg)
- Topic
- ICT-related incidents (management / classification / reporting)
- Article
-
28
- Paragraph
-
9
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
Not applicable
- Type of submitter
-
Other
- Subject matter
-
Validation rule v8821_m
- Question
-
The validation rule defines that in the event that column 020 of the template is valorised with the identification code indicating LEI code (eba_qCO:qx2000) then column 030 must be valorised with a LEI code.
In reality, column 020 indicates the type of code to identify the third-party ICT service provider indicated in column 010. Consequently, shouldn't the validation rule be correct that the check should be made on column 010 and not 030? - Background on the question
-
Expression of validation rule v8821_m
with{tB_05.01, default:0, interval: false}: if({c0020} = [eba_qCO:qx2000]) then ( (match({c0030}, "^[A-Z0-9]{18}[0-9]{2}$"))) endif - Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
This question has been rejected because the matter it refers to has been answered in the Frequently Asked Questions (see in particular No. 13).
- Status
-
Rejected question
