Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Pillar 3 data hub
      • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2023_6958 Applying a credit risk mitigation technique for large exposure purposes
Question ID
2023_6958
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Large exposures
Article
399
Paragraph
1
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
Not applicable
Type of submitter
Individual
Subject matter
Applying a credit risk mitigation technique for large exposure purposes
Question

Can an institution renounce applying a credit risk mitigation technique (CRM technique) for selected exposures in calculation of capital requirements for credit risk and as a result not apply that technique for that exposures for large exposure (LE) purposes?

Background on the question

In accordance with Article 108(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 ("CRR”) institution may use CRM in the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts for the purposes of points (a) and (f) of Article 92(3) of CRR.

 

For LE purposes, in accordance with Article 399(1) of CRR “an institution shall use a credit risk mitigation technique in the calculation of an exposure where it has used that technique to calculate capital requirements for credit risk in accordance with Title II of Part Three, provided that the credit risk mitigation technique meets the conditions set out in this Article”.

 

Taking into account the articles cited above, can an institution decide not to use a CRM technique in capital requirements for credit risk for selected exposures (resulting in higher RWA for such exposures) and as a result not recognise that technique for that exposures under LE rules?

 

For example:

Bank has two exposures (e1 and e2, both with risk weight 100%) to entity A, both fully guaranteed by entity B (guarantee g1 and g2, both with risk weight 50%). Guarantees g1 and g2 meet all eligibility conditions for capital requirements for credit risk and for LE purpose.

 

Can bank at the same time:

1) use guarantee g1 in capital requirements for credit risk (with risk weight 50%) and treat exposure e1 in LE as exposure to group of clients connected with B,

 and

2) not use guarantee g2 in capital requirements for credit risk (risk weight applied to exposure e2 will be 100%) and treat exposure e2 as exposure to group of clients connected with A?

 

Not being able to follow the approach described above could push bank to follow suboptimal credit decisions. If LE limit is fully utilized for entity B, bank will be able to grant naked loans to entity A (without the guarantee) but will not be able to grant guaranteed loans to that entity. Bank would increase its risk this way as guaranteed loan is obviously less risky. Both the text of the regulation and economic reasoning support the proposed approach.

Submission date
21/12/2023
Rejected publishing date
01/02/2024
Rationale for rejection

This question has been rejected because the issue it deals with is already explained or addressed in Article 399(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/876.

For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see “Additional background and guidance for asking questions”

Status
Rejected question

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive