Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Pillar 3 data hub
      • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2022_6662 Large exposure treatment of structured derivatives, such as collar financing transactions (‘CFTs’)
Question ID
2022_6662
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Large exposures
Article
401
Paragraph
4
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
N/A
Name of institution / submitter
Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME)
Country of incorporation / residence
United Kingdom
Type of submitter
Industry association
Subject matter
Large exposure treatment of structured derivatives, such as collar financing transactions (‘CFTs’)
Question

For the purposes of large exposures (‘LE’), what is the appropriate treatment for structured derivatives (like covered calls, CFTs, etc.) in the application of the mandatory substitution (‘risk shifting’) rule in accordance with CRR Article 401(4) that requires an institution to treat the portion of the exposure collateralised by the market value of funded credit risk mitigation (‘CRM’) as exposure to the third party (collateral issuer) rather than to the client?

Background on the question

Firstly, consider the instance of a covered call where, for example, a purchased call option is collateralised by the shares referenced by the option. In this case, if the shares default and so fall in value, then the option will expire worthless so there is no receivable from the client. Conversely, if the option has value, and thereby generates counterparty risk, then the shares must also be still performing and therefore be good collateral. Any risk to the shares will therefore be captured through market risk and the corresponding issuer risk for LE purposes. Consequently, requiring risk shifting as well would be duplicative.

Another structured derivative example is CFTs that provide clients with financing for their investment in a particular stock, limiting upside potential (short call) in exchange for downside protection (long put).  Unlike most other collateralised derivatives, the underlying shares of the call and put contracts that together form a ‘collar’, are posted by clients as collateral (either on a rehypothecatable or non-rehypothecatable basis) for financing.

As the CFT structure includes the sale of a put option to the counterparty, any fall in collateral value supporting the client receivable (from the financing or call option) would be offset by the increase in value of the put option the client has with the institution. Economically, there is no counterparty credit risk as the institution will never have any receivable from clients under any scenario (i.e. either the collateral has value to cover any potential receivable from the financing or call option or, if the collateral issuer defaults and the underlying share value falls, the bank will have a payable to client under the put option). Furthermore, each CFT transaction will have an external legal opinion that all elements within the CFT can be netted in the event of client default.

For LE purposes, the exposures considered for the CFTs are counterparty credit risk (CCR) and issuer risk, summarised as follows:

  1. Exposure to the client: CCR on the structured derivative (put/call/financing/collateral) is measured using SA-CCR after considering the effects of the collateral received as CRM (CRR Article 390(4))
  2. Exposure to the share issuer via the collar (issuer risk): the default of the underlying shares on the put and call option is subject to market risk (Article 390(5))
  3. Exposure to the share issuer via ‘risk shifting’: this amount is determined as the difference between the SA-CCR exposure with and without CRM (Article 401(4)).

Items (2) and (3) above are duplicative - the risk in (3) of the collateral issuer defaulting is already captured in the issuer risk requirement for the put and call option in (2) and does not lead to a further loss for the institution. 

  • Under a CFT, the equivalent number of shares received as collateral are also those referenced in the short put and long call option. 
  • Per Article 390(5), the LE rules already capture the risk on the default of the shares referenced in the put and call option. The shares cannot default twice and therefore risk shifting an amount to the collateral issuer as well would be double counting this risk.
  • In the event of collateral issuer default, the institution will always have a payable to the client due to the short put option. 
Submission date
14/12/2022
Rejected publishing date
27/01/2023
Rationale for rejection

This question has been rejected because the issue it deals with is already explained or addressed in Article 401(4) of the CRR.

The Single Rule Book Q&A tool has been established to provide explanations and non-binding interpretations on questions relating to the practical application or implementation of the provisions of legislative acts referred to in Article 1(2) of the EBA’s founding Regulation, as well as associated delegated and implementing acts, and guidelines and recommendations, adopted under these legislative acts.

For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see “Additional background and guidance for asking questions”.

Status
Rejected question

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive