Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Pillar 3 data hub
      • Reporting
        • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
        • Integrated reporting
        • Joint Bank Reporting Committee (JBRC)
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2021_5739 Calculation of the insufficient coverage for NPEs and capital absorptions related to Pillar 1 requirements on the same exposure
Question ID
2021_5739
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Own funds
Article
Article 47c
Paragraph
paragraph 1
Subparagraph
letter (b)
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
N/A
Type of submitter
Credit institution
Subject matter
Calculation of the insufficient coverage for NPEs and capital absorptions related to Pillar 1 requirements on the same exposure
Question
Regarding the applicable amount of the insufficient coverage to be deducted from own funds as per Article 36 (1) (m) CRR, to be determined at exposure level according to Article 47c(1) (b) of Regulation (EU) 2019/630, should the credit institutions applying the IRB approach consider the Pillar 1 capital absorptions already computed for credit risk for the calculation, on the same exposure, of the applicable amount to be deducted from CET 1 as per above, precisely to avoid any double-counting?
Background on the question
The Regulation (EU) 2019/630 (hereafter the "Backstop Regulation") has introduced minimum loss coverage levels (“Prudential Backstop” or “Calendar Provisioning”) on all the non-performing exposures, originated as of 26 April 2019. The two drivers underlying the application of the calendar scheduling are the date of classification as default (vintage) and the type of the underlying collateral, if any (i.e. NPE secured, according to the type of collateral, or unsecured). The CRR, as amended by the Backstop Regulation, foresees that if the specific credit risk adjustments (plus other items listed in Article 47c(1) are not sufficient compared to prudential minimum loss coverage, such difference should be directly deducted from CET1 capital, according to Article 36(1)(m). On the other hand, each exposure also generates capital absorptions deriving from the RWAs related to the credit risk. These capital absorptions affect institutions’ own funds regardless the adopted approach (e.g. IRB, Standard). Within this overall framework, it has to be pointed out that institutions under the Standardised approach are allowed to take into account the deduction pursuant to Article 36( 1) (m) in the calculation of both the RWAs, calculated as per Article 111 of the CRR, and the risk weight to be assigned to unsecured non-performing exposures, calculated as per Article 127 CRR. Moreover, for such institutions under the Standardised approach, Article 113 CRR foresees to avoid any double counting between the amount included in the own funds’ deduction and the one included in RWAs calculation. As regards credit institutions applying the IRB approach, it is not explicitly foreseen to consider the deduction as per Article 36( 1) (m) in the calculation of RWAs, since Article 166 CRR has not been amended. However, the provisions set out in Article 151(1) CRR seems to be consistent with the general principle to avoid double counting between the amount included in the own funds’ deduction and the one included in RWAs calculation. In fact, according to Article 151(1) CRR "the risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit risk for exposures belonging to one of the exposure classes referred to in points (a) to (e) and (g) of 147(2) shall, unless deducted from own funds, be calculated in accordance with Sub-section 2 except where those exposures are deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 items, Additional Tier 1 items or Tier 2 items." Therefore, it is not clear how credit institutions applying the IRB approach should consider the interrelation between the Pillar 1 capital requirements for credit risk and the deduction for insufficient coverage for non-performing exposures related to the same exposure. Example (for illustrative purposes): assuming a secured non-performing exposure with 5-year vintage having a gross exposure value of 100, a capital absorption for credit risk equal to 8 (hp: RW of 100% and an absorption of 8%), specific credit risk adjustments of 30. The regulatory expectation will be 35 (35% of the gross exposure value) and the related deduction will be 5 (resulting from the difference between the expectation of 35 and the specific credit risk adjustments performed on the exposure equal to 30). In this example, the institution should be impacted both from the deduction of 5 and the capital absorption of 8. Given that the bank has already accumulated capital for 8 to afford credit risk related to the exposure, the capital absorption of 8 could be taken into account when the institution calculated the distance from the expectation. In doing so, the deduction as per Article 36(1)(m), should be equal to 0 (resulting from the difference between the expectation of 35 and the sum of both the specific credit risk adjustments performed on the exposure equal to 30 and the capital absorption of 8).
Submission date
15/02/2021
Rejected publishing date
31/05/2022
Rationale for rejection

This question has been rejected because addressing it would require amendments to the legal text, which goes beyond the objective of the Q&A tool.

The Single Rule Book Q&A tool has been established to provide explanations and non-binding interpretations on questions relating to the practical application or implementation of the provisions of legislative acts referred to in Article 1(2) of the EBA’s founding Regulation, as well as associated delegated and implementing acts, and guidelines and recommendations, adopted under these legislative acts.

For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see “Additional background and guidance for asking questions”.

Status
Rejected question

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive