This question relates to what we think is a mistake made by EBA in its opinion EBA-Op-2018-04, from which you could derive the conclusion that EBA thinks that exemption under Article 17 is not applicable for the payer’s PSP for card-based payments.

In its opinion, EBA-Op-2018-04 the EBA provides in Table 2 an overview of whether the payer’s PSP (issuer) and/or the payee’s PSP (acquirer) can decide on each of the exemptions set out under Articles 10 to 18.

In relation to Article 17 and the payee’s PSP’s ability to apply this exemption, the table says “No” for Credit transfers and “N/A” for Cards. Though we certainly agree that this exemption is only applicable for the Payer’s PSP, and not applicable for the Payee’s PSP, there should be no distinction in this between card-based payments versus credit transfers. I.e. this exemption is applicable for the payer’s PSP also for card-based payments, and the values for Article 17 in this table for the Payee’s PSP should be “No” for Cards as well as for “Credit Transfers”.

To compare with Article 15, for which there is also a “N/A” in the Cards column for the payee’s PSP: Article 15 explicitly refers to credit transfers, is therefore not applicable for card-based payments, and the “N/A” is therefore relevant. In Article 17 there is no mention of either credit transfers or card-based payments, and must therefore be applicable for both, i.e. the “N/A” is incorrect.

There are important solutions with dedicated processes and protocols between travel agencies, card issuers and their corporate customers that are based on the card infrastructure and card-based accounts, and should therefore be eligible to be exempted from SCA under Article 17.