- Question ID
-
2016_2838
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Leverage ratio
- Article
-
128
- Paragraph
-
2
- Subparagraph
-
(b)
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
na
- Type of submitter
-
Individual
- Subject matter
-
Max amount of cash leverage in the mandate of an AIF in order to NOT be considered as a high risk exposure
- Question
-
What is the maximum permitted “cash leverage” allowed in the mandate of the alternative investment fund (AIF) in order not be considered high risk?
In the event the AIF is NOT considered to be high risk, should then Article 132 CRR be taken as reference?
- Background on the question
-
I am trying to understand the risk weight requirement for a bank that invests into an AIF and how the use of cash leverage influences such requirement.
Article 128(2)(b) CRR states that an investment into a AIF as defined in Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2011/61/EU is an exposure with particularly high risks EXCEPT where the mandate of the fund does not allow a leverage higher than that required under Article 51(3) of Directive 2009/65/EC (UCITS Directive).
Article 51(3) of Directive 2009/65/EC only refers to derivatives instruments, rather than, for example, traditional bank leverage (cash) that the AIF may use in order to buy additional assets in order to achieve higher yield (i.e. AIF obtains a loan from third party (cash) that is reinvested).
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
Please note that as part of adjustments to the Single Rulebook Q&A process, agreed by the EBA and the European Commission, it has been decided to reject outstanding questions submitted before 1 January 2020, when the Q&A process was updated as part of the last ESAs Review. In particular, the question that you have submitted has now regrettably been rejected and will not be addressed.
If you believe your question would still benefit from clarification, you are invited to resubmit your question, adapting it to reflect any legislative, regulatory or other relevant developments that may have occurred since the initial date of submission. The EBA will aim to address resubmitted questions as a matter of priority. When considering to resubmit, you are kindly requested to observe the updated admissibility criteria agreed in the context of the adjustment of the Q&A process, available in the Additional background and guidance for asking questions. We hope for your understanding.
For further information please refer to the press release and the updated Q&A page.
- Status
-
Rejected question