- Question ID
-
2013_382
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Own funds
- Article
-
18
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
N/A
- Type of submitter
-
Credit institution
- Subject matter
-
Inclusion of ancillary services undertakings in prudential consolidation
- Question
-
Should the ancillary services undertakings be included in prudential consolidation according to Article 18 and 19 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)?
- Background on the question
-
According to Article18(1) of CRR only "institutions and financial institutions" should be included in prudential consolidation. But in Article 19(1) of CRR is mentioned, that “an institution, financial institution or an ancillary services undertaking which is a subsidiary or an undertaking in which a participation is held, need not to be included in the consolidation” in some circumstances, which means that also ancillary services undertakings should be included in prudential consolidation if they do not meet the conditions mentioned in Article 19(1).
- Submission date
- Final publishing date
-
- Final answer
-
Where consolidated supervision is required pursuant to Article 111 of Directive 2013/36/EU, Article 18(8) of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 requires the inclusion of ancillary services undertakings within the scope of prudential consolidation in accordance with the methods laid down in Article 18.
Disclaimer:
This question goes beyond matters of consistent and effective application of the regulatory framework. A Directorate-General of the Commission (Directorate General for Internal Market and Services) has prepared the answer, albeit that only the Court of Justice of the European Union can provide definitive interpretations of EU legislation. This is an unofficial opinion of that Directorate General, which the European Banking Authority publishes on its behalf. The answers are not binding on the European Commission as an institution. You should be aware that the European Commission could adopt a position different from the one expressed in such Q&As, for instance in infringement proceedings or after a detailed examination of a specific case or on the basis of any new legal or factual elements that may have been brought to its attention.
- Status
-
Final Q&A
- Answer prepared by
-
Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law.
- Note to Q&A
-
Update 26.03.2021: This Q&A has not yet been reviewed by the European Commission in the light of the changes introduced to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR).
Disclaimer
The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.