Amundi’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing its effectiveness, digital adaptation, and retail investor protection, while advocating for regulatory stability ahead of the 2022 exemption deadline for key information documents (KIDs).
EIOPA’s Insurance and Reinsurance Stakeholder Group provides advice to the Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities on PRIIPs Regulation, addressing scope, disclosure simplification, and consumer understanding for insurance products.
ESMA Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (SMSG) response to ESAs on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document (KID) effectiveness, investor trust, digital media use, and proposed reforms for retail investor protection and transparency.
ACEPI’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document’s effectiveness, challenges in structured products (e.g., autocallables, RIY), and proposed reforms for retail investor protection under the EU’s Capital Markets Union strategy.
Actuarial Association of Europe responds to EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA call for evidence on PRIIPs Regulation review, focusing on KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, sanctions, and retail investor protection under the EU’s retail investment strategy.
AFEP, the French Association of Large Companies, submits feedback to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, focusing on corporate bond treatment, KID effectiveness, and retail investor protection under the EU’s retail investment strategy.
AFG’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, advocating for postponing major revisions until the 2022 revised Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) are implemented for UCITS and retail AIFs, citing limited industry experience and EU competitiveness concerns.
Assuralia’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, contributing insights on retail investor protection, KID usage, comprehension alerts, digital adaptation, and enforcement under the EU’s retail investment strategy review.
Austrian Federal Economic Chamber’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, emphasizing the need for a holistic, evidence-based approach, thorough consumer testing, and adequate implementation timelines for retail investment product disclosures.
BDV’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and enforcement under the EU’s retail investment strategy ahead of 2022 legislative proposals.
BETTER FINANCE submission to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, highlighting low retail investor satisfaction with Key Information Documents (KIDs), particularly on costs, performance, and risk disclosures, and advocating for Level 1 reforms to improve clarity and comparability of investment products.
BIPAR’s response to the European Supervisory Authorities’ call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document’s use, effectiveness, and adaptability to digital media, while providing feedback on retail investor protection and regulatory improvements.
ANIA’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, advocating for KID simplification, digital delivery, flexibility for multi-option insurance products, and clearer regulatory guidance to enhance retail investor protection and product transparency.
ASPIM’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document’s use, comprehension alerts, digital adaptation, and enforcement—supporting retail investor protection reforms under the EU’s Capital Markets Union strategy.
ALFI’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing key issues like the Key Information Document (KID) effectiveness, digital adaptation, scope, and investor protection, while advocating for a level playing field in product disclosures and consumer-tested reforms.
Assogestioni’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, performance scenarios, cost disclosure, and transition from UCITS KIID to PRIIPs KID by 2023.
ASSORETI’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document (KID) effectiveness, digital adaptation, enforcement, and scope—supporting the EU’s retail investment strategy review by 2022.
Deutscher Derivate Verband (DDV) responds to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, highlighting market adaptation challenges, investor comprehension issues with Key Information Documents (KIDs), and concerns over information overload affecting retail investor decisions.
Deutsches Aktieninstitut’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and regulatory scope as part of the EU’s retail investment strategy review.
ESBG’s response to the European Commission’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing KID usage, comprehension alerts, digital adaptation, enforcement, and scope—supporting retail investor protection reforms under the Capital Markets Union Action Plan.