EBA E-mail alert 8 May, 2026

Should the service consisting in exchanging electronic money tokens for other crypto-assets be qualified as exchange of crypto-assets for crypto assets or as exchange of funds for crypto assets?

Regarding entities exempted from authorisation pursuant to Article 16(2) of MiCAR, they shall notify the white paper to the competent authority of the home Member State, and the NCA is responsible for forwarding on the white paper of these entities to ESMA. However, it is unclear how the white paper is made available to the intended audiences of customers, and other relevant stakeholders and investors. Article 28 on publication of crypto-asset white papers only refers to ‘approved’ white papers (in accordance with Article 17(1) or Article 21(1) of MiCAR), without referring to notified white papers of exempted entities under Article 16(2) of MiCAR. Therefore, does Article 28 on publication of white paper of ART issuers also applies to issuers exempted under Article 16(2) of MiCAR?"

Are articles 146 (for credit institutions) and 48(3) (for e-money institutions) to be interpreted as submitting credit institutions and e-money institutions issuing ART/EMT on a crossborder basis to comply with the existing passporting framework set for these categories of establishments respectively by directives 2013/36/EU and 2009/110/EC? 

Can a global insurance against damages on a portfolio of exposures secured by immovable properties subscribed directly by the lending institution be considered as compliant with the requirement of Article 208(5) of the CRR - that is to say considered, under the standardized approach, as meeting the operational requirements for the purpose of treating exposures secured by mortgages on immovable property (or in case an institution has opted for the application of article 108(5)(a) allowing to consider a guaranteed exposure as an exposure secured by a mortgage on immovable property) as duly secured from an RWA computation perspective under Article 124(2) of the CRR?