- Question ID
-
2013_607
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
- Article
-
99
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
- Article/Paragraph
-
Table 5
- Type of submitter
-
Credit institution
- Subject matter
-
Template 5 - Missing Validation Rule
- Question
-
German Question (Deutsche Frage): Während die nun verbal formulierte Zuordnung der “balances receivable on demand classified as cash balances at central banks“ zu Tabelle 5 (alt 9) in den alten Validation Rules ausdrücklich als Formelbezug angegeben war (F 09.00, r010, c010 = F 01.01, r030, c010), ist diese Verbindung in den aktuellen Validation Rules nicht mehr angegeben. Wie ist dies zu interpretieren? English Question: Whereas the now verbally formulated assignment of the ‘balances receivable on demand classified as cash balances at central banks’ to table 5 (prev. 9) was given expressly as a formula in the old validation rules (F 09.00, r010, c010 = F 01.01, r030, c010), this connection is no longer given in the current validation rules. How should this be interpreted?
- Background on the question
-
Validation Rule Interpretation.
- Submission date
- Final publishing date
-
- Final answer
-
German Answer (Deutsche Antwort):
Der Entfall der Validation Rule die ({F 01.01, r 030, c010} mit {F 05.00, r010, c010} vergleicht war nicht beabsichtigt, da beide Zellen exakt den selben Betrag abfragen.
English Answer:
The exclusion of the validation rule that links ({F 01.01, r 030, c010} = {F 05.00, r010, c010} was not intended as both cells ask exactly the same amounts.
- Status
-
Final Q&A
- Answer prepared by
-
Answer prepared by the EBA.