Consultation on revised draft Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) and supervisory stress testing

The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched today a public consultation on its revised Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) and supervisory stress testing. The comprehensive revisions aim at implementing the recent amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD V) and Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR II), as well as aligning with other regulatory developments and best supervisory practices. The consultation runs until 28 September 2021.

SREP is an ongoing supervisory process bringing together findings from all supervisory activities into a comprehensive supervisory overview of an institution. These Guidelines aim at achieving convergence of practices followed by competent authorities across the EU in their SREP and supervisory stress testing processes.

The current review of the SREP Guidelines affects all main SREP elements, including (i) business model analysis, (ii) assessment of internal governance and institution-wide control arrangements, (iii) assessment of risks to capital and capital adequacy to cover these risks, and (iv) assessment of liquidity and funding risks and adequacy of liquidity resources to cover such risks. The main amendments implementing the requirements laid down in the CRD V and CRR II include the following:

  • reviewing institutions’ categorisation and application of the minimum engagement model to reflect the new definitions on small and non-complex as well as large institutions, thus better embedding the proportionality principle;
  • incorporating an assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF)  risks, in line with the EBA Opinion on how to take into account ML/TF risks in the SREP published in November 2020;
  • reviewing the provisions on Pillar 2 capital add-ons and the Pillar 2 guidance in accordance with Articles 104a and 104b of Directive 2013/36/EU, to ensure that they reflect a purely microprudential perspective;
  • providing clarifications on the assessment of the risk of excessive leverage and the related Pillar 2 capital add-ons and the Pillar 2 guidance in order to reflect the separate stack of own funds requirements based on the leverage ratio;
  • adjusting the requirements for the assessment of the interest rate risk in the non-trading book, as well as the assessment of liquidity risk and liquidity adequacy to align them with the current regulatory framework.

Consultation process

Comments to the two consultations can be sent to the EBA by clicking on the "send your comments" button on the respective consultation page. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 28 September 2021.

A public hearing will take place on 31 August 2021 from 11:00 to 12:30.

All contributions received will be published following the end of the consultation, unless requested otherwise.

Legal basis, background and next steps

These draft Guidelines have been developed on the basis of Article 107(3) of Directive 2013/36/EU, which mandates the Authority to further specify the common procedures and methodologies for the SREP.

The EBA Guidelines will apply to competent authorities across the EU. Once the revised Guidelines will enter into force, the current SREP Guidelines will be repealed.

Consultation on amendments to RTS on credit risk adjustments in the context of the calculation of the Risk Weight

The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched today a public consultation on amendments to its Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on credit risk adjustments in the context of the calculation of the Risk Weight (RW) of defaulted exposures under the Standardised Approach (SA). The proposed amendments follow up on the European Commission’s Action Plan to tackle non-performing loans in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, which indicated the need for a revision of the treatment of defaulted exposures under the SA. This update is necessary to ensure the prudential framework does not create disincentives to the sale of non-performing assets. The consultation runs until 24 September 2021.

The Commission’s Action Plan specifically asks the EBA to consider the appropriate regulatory treatment of defaulted assets, as laid out in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), which have been sold at a discount, i.e. NPL sales. Under the current regulatory framework, the capital charge for a defaulted exposure may – under certain circumstances - increase after its sale from a risk weight of 100% on the seller’s balance sheet to a risk weight of 150% on the balance sheet of the credit institution buying the assets.

The proposed amendment to the existing RTS on credit risk adjustments introduces a change to the recognition of total credit risk adjustments, which ensures that the risk weight can remain the same in both cases. In particular, the price discount stemming from the sale will be recognised as a credit risk adjustment for the purposes of determining the risk weight.

By implementing this change through an RTS amendment, the EBA aims at clarifying the regulatory treatment of sold NPL assets. However, the EBA also recommends that the treatment set out in this RTS be included in the Commission’s considerations as part of the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR3) proposal, which is expected at a later stage.

Consultation process

Comments on the consultation can be sent to the EBA by clicking on the “send your comments” button on the consultation page. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 24 September 2021.

public hearing will take place via conference call on 13 July 2021 from 11:00 to 12:00 CEST.

All contributions received will be published after the consultation closes, unless requested otherwise.

Legal basis and background

  • Article 110(4)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 mandates the EBA to specify the amounts that need to be included in the calculation of credit risk adjustments for the determination of default under Article 178 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
  • In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is desirable to remove any impediment to the creation of secondary markets for defaulted exposures. In this context, a misalignment between the risk weight applied to defaulted assets and the potential for unexpected losses in relation to the level of already expected losses could create undue obstacles for credit institutions to move their non-performing loans off their balance sheets.
  • It is therefore necessary to ensure that the specific credit risk adjustments recognised for Article 127(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 incorporate any discount in a transaction price that the buyer has not recognised by increasing CET1 capital.

Consultation on draft ITS amending ITS on Supervisory Reporting with regards to COREP and asset encumbrance reporting

  • The EBA is proposing to streamline asset encumbrance reporting for small and non-complex institutions.
  • It is also proposing changes to COREP securitisation and G-SII reporting.
  • The proposals are a step forward in the implementation of the EBA’s cost reduction measures included in its study on the cost of compliance with supervisory reporting requirements.

The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched today a public consultation to amend its Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) on Supervisory Reporting with regards to COREP and asset encumbrance reporting as well as the reporting for the purposes of identifying global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs). Among others, this consultation paper aims to enhance proportionality in the area of asset encumbrance reporting, as recommended by the EBA’s Report on the Study on the Cost of compliance with supervisory reporting requirements (CoC report). The consultation runs until 23 September 2021.

In response to the Capital Markets Recovery Package (CMRP), the reporting on securitisations needs to be amended to keep it aligned with the prudential requirements. Furthermore, the EBA is proposing some minor amendments to COREP (reporting on own funds and own funds requirements) in order to obtain a deeper understanding of institution’s use of the option to exempt certain software assets from the deduction from own funds.

Following the proposals for enhanced proportionality on asset encumbrance reporting, small and non-complex institutions will be exempted from the reporting of more granular data, as proposed in the CoC report. Besides that, this consultation paper suggests changing the definition of the level of asset encumbrance.

Regarding the reporting of information for determining G-SIIs and assigning G-SII buffer rates, the EBA is proposing to slightly expand the scope of application of the reporting obligation, to include standalone entities, and not only banking groups, that meet the relevant criteria.

Consultation process

Comments to this consultation can be sent to the EBA by clicking on the "send your comments" button on the consultation page. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 23 September 2021. All contributions received will be published following the end of the consultation, unless requested otherwise.

A public hearing will be organised in the form of a webinar on 9 July from 10:30 to 11:30 CET. The EBA invites interested stakeholders to register using this link by 6 July, 16:00 at the latest. The dial-in details will be communicated after the registration deadline.

Legal basis and next steps

These draft ITS have been developed in accordance with Article 430 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, which mandates the EBA to develop and specify uniform formats, definitions, frequencies and reference and remittance dates and IT solutions for the reporting to supervisory authorities.

The EBA expects to submit these draft ITS to the European Commission in Q4 2021 or Q1 2022. The revised requirements are envisaged to apply from the reference date 31 December 2022.

Consultation on draft RTS on Individual Portfolio Management of loans offered by crowdfunding service providers

The European Banking Authority (EBA) published today a consultation paper on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) specifying the information that crowdfunding service providers offering individual portfolio management of loans shall provide to investors in relation to the method to assess credit risk, and on each individual portfolio. The draft Regulatory Technical Standards also specify the policies, procedures and organisational arrangements that crowdfunding service providers shall have in place in relation to any contingency fund they may offer to investors. The consultation runs until 4 September 2021.

In order to reduce the information asymmetry between crowdfunding service providers and investors, as well as to ensure transparency and adequate protection for investors, the latter should have access to all relevant information about the composition of the portfolio, including the projects where their funds are invested, as well as the quality of the loans financing these projects.

Investors are exposed not only to risks connected to the projects or the loans in which their funds are invested, but also to the way the crowdfunding service provider assesses the risk of these loans and projects and how it manages the selection of loans for the portfolio.

Against this backdrop, these draft RTS require crowdfunding service providers to show that the measurement techniques used for credit risk assessments are based on a sufficient number of elements and are appropriate to the complexity and level of the risks underlying i) the single projects; ii) the portfolio; iii) the project owners. In addition, the draft RTS set out the information that crowdfunding platforms must disclose referring to several key characteristics of each loan included in a certain portfolio.

Finally, as crowdfunding service providers may offer a dedicated contingency fund to compensate investors for the losses they may incur, in case project owners do not reimburse their loans, the draft RTS specify adequate policies, procedures and governance arrangements that providers should have in place when managing, either directly or through a third party provider, contingency funds.

Consultation process

Comments to this consultation can be sent to the EBA by clicking on the "send your comments" button on the consultation page. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 4 September 2021. All contributions received will be published following the end of the consultation, unless requested otherwise.

A public hearing will be organised in the form of a webinar on 20 July 2021 from 11:00 to 12:30 CET. The EBA invites interested stakeholders to register using this link. The dial-in details will be communicated in due course.

Legal basis

These draft RTS have been developed according to Articles 6(7) of Regulation (EU) No 1503/2020 (European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation - ECSPR), which mandates the EBA to develop, in close cooperation with the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA), draft RTS to specify:

  • the elements, including the format, that are to be included in the description of the method used for the assessment of credit risk of i) individual crowdfunding projects selected for the investor’s portfolio; ii) individual portfolios; iii) the project owners selected for the investor’s portfolio;   
  • the information that the crowdfunding service provider should provide to investors on each individual portfolio
  • the policies, procedures and organisational arrangements that crowdfunding service providers are to have in place as regards any contingency funds they might offer as referred to in Art. 6(5) and Art. 6(6) of ECSPR.

Consultation on draft ITS on disclosure of information on exposures to interest rate risk on positions not held in the trading book

The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched today a public consultation on draft implementing technical standards (ITS) on Pillar 3 disclosures regarding exposures to interest rate risk on positions not held in the trading book (IRRBB). The draft ITS put forward comparable disclosures that would allow stakeholders to assess institutions’ IRRBB risk management framework as well as the sensitivity of institutions’ economic value of equity and net interest income to changes in interest rates. The proposed standards will amend the comprehensive ITS on institutions’ public disclosures, in line with the strategic objective of developing a single and comprehensive Pillar 3 package that should facilitate implementation by institutions and further promote market discipline.

The draft ITS propose qualitative disclosures on how institutions calculate their IRRBB exposure values based on their internal measurement systems and on institutions’ overall IRRBB objective and management. They also provide quantitative disclosures about the impact of changes in interest rates on institutions’ economic value of equity and net interest income.

In addition, given the ongoing EBA work on the policy framework for IRRBB, the EBA is proposing transitional provisions that should facilitate institutions’ disclosures while the policy frameworks is being finalised.

Consultation process

Comments to this consultation can be sent to the EBA by clicking on the "send your comments" button on the consultation page. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 30 August 2021. All contributions received will be published following the end of the consultation, unless requested otherwise.

A public hearing will be organised in the form of a webinar on 30 June 2021 from 11:00 to 12:30 CET. The EBA invites interested stakeholders to register using this  link (by no later than 28 June 2021, 16:00).

The dial-in details will be communicated in due course.

Legal basis and background

Article 448 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (‘CRR’) requires institutions to disclose, as from 28 June 2021, quantitative and qualitative information on the risks arising from potential changes in interest rates that affect both the economic value of equity and the net interest income of their non-trading book activities referred to in Article 84 and Article 98(5) of the Directive 2013/36/EU (Capital requirements directive- CRD).

The EBA has developed the draft ITS following the mandate in Article 434a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. These ITS will amend the Implementing Regulation (EU) No 637/2021 of 15 March 2021 with the aim to facilitate the institutions’ compliance to Article 448 CRR.

When developing these proposals, the EBA has built on BCBS’s Pillar 3 disclosure framework.

The EBA expects to submit these draft ITS to the European Commission in October 2021.

Consultation on draft RTS on a central database on AML/CFT in the EU

The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched today a public consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on a central database on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in the EU. This database will be a key tool for the EBA’s recently enhanced mandate to lead, coordinate and monitor AML/CFT efforts in the European Union. The consultation runs until 17 June 2021. 

The revised EBA Regulation that came into effect in January 2020 requires the EBA to establish and keep up to date a central database with information on AML/CFT weaknesses that competent authorities (CAs) across the EU have identified in respect of individual financial institutions. The database will also contain information on the measures competent authorities have taken to rectify those material AML/CFT weaknesses. Information from this database will be used by individual competent authorities and the EBA to make the fight against ML/TF in the EU more targeted and effective in the future.

The draft RTS proposed in this Consultation Paper specify the definition and the materiality of weaknesses identified by competent authorities, the type of information collected, and how such information will be communicated to the EBA. It also sets out how the EBA will analyse and disseminate the information contained in the AML/CFT central database.

Moreover, the draft RTS set out the rules to ensure the effectiveness of the database, the confidentiality of the data contained in the database, as well as how the database will interact with other notifications that competent authorities are required to provide to the EBA and the provisions to ensure the protection of personal data.

The AML/CFT central database will be a key tool in coordinating efforts to prevent and counter ML/TF in the Union. It will serve as an early warning tool to enable the competent authorities to act before the ML/TF risks crystalise and help them plan their on-site inspections and perform off-site monitoring.

Consultation process 

The Consultation Paper is composed of the draft RTS as well as an Annex that sets out, firstly, the technical specifications with the data points that will be contained in the database and, secondly, the list of authorities that will be indirectly submitting to the AML/CFT database in accordance with article 13(7) of the draft RTS. As those technical specifications are not part of the draft RTS, the EBA is not required to consult on them but has decided to offer the respondents the possibility to provide comments also on those.

Comments to the draft Consultation Paper can be sent by clicking on the "send your comments" button on the EBA's consultation page. The deadline for the submission of comments is 17 June 2021. 

All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless requested otherwise. 

In parallel, the EBA is seeking the view of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) on these draft RTS, in accordance with Article 42(1) of the Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (EUDPR). The response of the EDPS will be taken into consideration when the final report on this draft RTS will be developed.

Legal basis and background 

The proposed RTSs have been developed in fulfillment of the mandates conferred on the EBA in Articles 9a(1) and (3) of the EBA Regulation. As part of the mandate to lead, coordinate and monitor AML/CFT in Europe, said Articles require the EBA to develop two RTSs to establish and keep up to date an AML/CFT central database. The mandate foresees for the AML/CFT central database to contain information on AML/CFT weaknesses that have been identified by competent authorities and on the measures taken by them in response to those material weaknesses. Given the complementary character of those RTS, the EBA has drafted them as a single instrument.

The EBA has performed a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (EUDPR). The DPIA analyses the risks arising from the processing of personal data and establishes the controls that will be put in place by the EBA to mitigate the risks identified. A summary of this draft DPIA is published on the EBA’s website for full transparency alongside the Consultation Paper.

Consultation on draft Guidelines on the delineation and reporting of available financial means of DGS

  • The proposed Guidelines aim to improve consumer confidence in financial stability throughout the EU by establishing a more harmonised approach to funding DGSs and increase transparency and comparability of the financial position of DGSs.
  • The EBA proposes to delineate clearly that only funds contributed by credit institution to the ex-ante funds of DGSs will count towards reaching the target level of said funds.
  • The EBA proposes to expand the current reporting requirements from DGSs to the EBA and to publish more information about DGS funding on the EBA website.

The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched today a public consultation on its draft Guidelines on the delineation and reporting of available financial means (AFM) of Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGSs). The purpose of the Guidelines is to ensure that only funds that credit institutions contributed, or that stem indirectly from such contributions such as recoveries or investment income, will count towards reaching the target level of the DGS fund. Conversely, funds that stem directly or indirectly from borrowed resources should not count towards the target level. This clarification aims at preventing the situation where a DGS could meet the target level by taking out a loan.

By developing these Guidelines, the EBA follows up on its recommendations made in the EBA Opinion on deposit guarantee scheme funding and uses of deposit guarantee scheme funds (“the Opinion”) published on 23 January 2020. In the Opinion, the EBA identified differences across Member States in relation to the interpretation of the concept of AFM. The Opinion recommended clarifying Directive 2014/49/EU (DGSD) that borrowed funds or funds stemming from borrowed funds should not count towards reaching the minimum target level for DGS funds.

Given that a review of the DGSD is still several years away from being proposed, negotiated and finalised, the proposed Guidelines provide such a clarification ahead of any such changes, using the existing DGSD as a legal basis. More precisely, the draft Guidelines clarify that AFM are comprised of two subsets:

  • Qualified AFM (QAFM) – funds stemming directly or indirectly from contributions of DGS member institutions, which qualify towards reaching the target level of the DGS fund;
  • Other AFM – funds, which are not QAFM, including borrowed funds that stem from liabilities such as loans, and hence do not count towards reaching the target level of the DGS fund.

In terms of reporting, the proposed Guidelines will extend the reporting requirements from DGSs to the EBA in order to reflect the clarified concept of AFM, QAFM and other AFM proposed earlier in the Guidelines. They also require the reporting on outstanding liabilities of DGSs, unclaimed repayments, and high-level information on alternative funding arrangements that are in place. That information would be published on the EBA website annually and should provide more transparency and comparability of the financial position of DGSs across the EU.

Consultation process

Comments to this consultation can be sent to the EBA by clicking on the "send your comments" button on the consultation page. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 28 July 2021. All received contributions will be published at the end of the consultation, unless requested otherwise.

A public hearing will take place via conference call on Monday 28 June 2021 from 10:00 to 12:00 CEST.

Legal basis 

These draft own-initiative Guidelines have been developed according to Articles 16(1) and 26(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (EBA Regulation). The Guidelines aim at harmonizing the funding of DGSs according to Article 10(1) of Directive 2014/49/EU (DGSD) and thereby strive to strengthen the European system of national DGSs in accordance with Article 26(1) of the EBA Regulation.

Consultation on draft RTS on emerging markets and advanced economies

The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched today a public consultation on its draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on the list of countries with an advanced economy for calculating the equity risk under the alternative standardised approach (FRTB-SA). These RTS are part of the phase 3 deliverables of the EBA roadmap for the new market and counterparty credit risk approaches. The consultation runs until 2 July 2021.

Institutions using the alternative standardised approach to determine own funds requirements for market risk are required to compute the equity risk stemming from their trading book positions in accordance with a prescribed set of risk factors and corresponding risk weights. To determine the appropriate risk-weight, institutions are to identify whether a risk factor refers to an advanced economy or an emerging market. Risk factors mapped to the advanced economy bucket benefit from a lower risk weight compared to those mapped to the emerging market bucket.

To ensure compliance with the international standards, the consultation paper proposes a list of advanced economies corresponding to the list provided in the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB). In this context, the EBA seeks feedback on whether the list is comprehensive, in particular, whether there are additional EU countries where the equity risk can be considered similar to the countries’ already included in the FRTB list of advanced economies. Furthermore, the EBA seeks stakeholders’ views on sources of data and criteria that could be designed to identify advanced economies and emerging markets for the purpose of FRTB-SA equity risk own funds requirements.

Consultation process

Comments to this consultation can be sent to the EBA by clicking on the "send your comments" button on the consultation page. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 2 July 2021. All contributions received will be published following the end of the consultation, unless requested otherwise.

The public hearing on these draft RTS will take place on 29 April 2021 from 15.30 to 18.00 CEST and will be held jointly with the public hearing on draft RTS on jump to default amounts and residual risk add-on.

Legal basis 

These draft RTS have been developed according to Article 325ap(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR), which mandates the EBA to specify what constitutes an emerging market and to specify what constitutes an advanced economy.

Consultation on draft RTS on disclosure of investment policy by investment firms

  • The draft technical standards specify the information that investment firms have to make public to show their influence over the companies in which they have voting rights.
  • The standards put forward comparable disclosures and detailed instructions on investment firms’ voting rights, voting guidelines and voting behaviour.

The European Banking Authority (EBA) published today a consultation paper on draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) on disclosure of investment policy by investment firms. The draft RTS put forward comparable disclosures that should help stakeholders understand investment firms’ influence over the companies in which they have voting rights and the impact of investment firms’ policies on aspects such as the governance or management of those companies.

The draft RTS put forward templates and tables for the disclosure of information on the investment firm’s voting behaviour, explanation of the votes, and the ratio of approved proposal, with the objective to show if the investment firm is an active shareholder that generally uses its voting rights, and how it uses them. They also include information on the use of proxy advisory firms that should help address uncertainties about potential conflicts of interest. Finally, they include information on investment firms’ voting guidelines, including, when relevant, a breakdown by geographical zone, economic sector or topic of the resolution being voted.

These disclosure requirements apply to class 2 investment firms with total assets above EUR 100 million. These firms will have to disclose this information in relation to those companies whose shares are admitted to trading on a regulated market and in which the proportion of voting rights exceeds 5 % of all voting rights issued by the company.

Consultation process

Comments to this consultation can be sent to the EBA by clicking on the "send your comments" button on the consultation page. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 1 July 2021. All contributions received will be published following the end of the consultation, unless requested otherwise.

A public hearing will be organised in the form of a webinar on 6 May from 11:00 to 13:00 CEST. The EBA invites interested stakeholders to register using this link.

The dial-in details will be communicated in due course

Legal basis and background

The Investment Firms Regulation (IFR) sets out in Article 52 the requirement for investment firms to disclose information on investment policy, including the following information: (1) proportion of voting rights attached to shares held, (2) voting behaviour, (3) use of proxy advisor firms and (4) voting guidelines. The same Article mandates the EBA to develop in consultation with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) to specify templates for investment policy disclosure of investment firms. This information will be published on a yearly basis, along with the financial statements.

Consultation on draft revised Guidelines on recovery plans indicators

  • The revised Guidelines provide a common EU standard for the recovery plan indicators to ensure they can promptly signal a stressed situation and enable the institution to consider timely and effective recovery actions.
  • The key objective of the revised Guidelines is to strengthen the quality of the recovery indicators framework in order to ensure institutions’ effective crisis preparedness.
  • The amendments of the revised Guidelines introduce few changes to the minimum list of recovery indicators and focus on practical aspects such as calibration of the thresholds of recovery plan indicators and their monitoring.

The European Banking Authority (EBA) published today a consultation paper on its revised Guidelines on recovery plan indicators. While maintaining overall stability to the current recovery plan indicators framework, the revised Guidelines provide additional guidance on indicators’ calibration, monitoring and breaches notifications. The amendments aim at strengthening the quality of recovery indicators framework and contributing to effective crisis preparedness of institutions. 

The main objective of recovery plan indicators is to help institutions monitor and respond to the emergence and evolution of stress. The EBA issued the existing Guidelines on recovery plan indicators in 2015 but decided to amend them based on practical experience acquired in recovery planning. 

The revised Guidelines provide additional guidance on the calibration of thresholds of recovery indicators to ensure that recovery options are implemented early enough to be effective. The amendments also emphasise the importance of constant monitoring of recovery indicators and timely notification of their breaches to supervisors. Lastly, three new recovery indicators (MREL/TLAC, asset encumbrance and liquidity position) have been added to the minimum list of recovery indicators and one (cost of wholesale funding) has been removed.

Consultation process

Comments to this consultation can be sent to the EBA by clicking on the "send your comments" button on the consultation page. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 18 June 2021. All contributions received will be published following the end of the consultation, unless requested otherwise.

A public hearing will be organised in the form of a webinar on 15 April from 14:00 to 16:00 CET. The EBA invites interested stakeholders to register using this link.

The dial-in details will be communicated in due course.

Legal basis, background and next steps

In accordance with Article 9(1) of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), a recovery plan should include a framework of indicators established by each institution with the aim of identifying the points at which the escalation process should be activated and to assess what appropriate actions referred to in the recovery plan may be taken.

Under the mandate of Article 9(2) of BRRD, in 2015 the EBA issued Guidelines to specify the minimum list of quantitative and qualitative indicators for the purposes of recovery planning (EBA-GL-2015-02). Since the development of the Guidelines in 2015, significant practical experience in developing and assessing recovery plans has been acquired. Against this background, the EBA has concluded that, while limited amendments to its existing Guidelines are needed, it is necessary to introduce additional guidance on certain parts of the indicator framework.

The revised Guidelines are published for a three-month public consultation where the EBA is consulting only on changes to the existing Guidelines on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery plan indicators. There is no consultation on the text of the original Guidelines, which remains unchanged.

The EBA will finalise these Guidelines once the consultation responses have been assessed. Upon publication of the final Guidelines, the original ones on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery plan indicators will be repealed.