« Back

Banco de España

Structural representation of taxonomy changes: Respondents are asked to consider if these arrangements will in fact provide them with any benefits, or if they believe an alternative possible implementation would generally be more beneficial.
N/A
Tables utilising new layout features: Since both of these are features that happened not to have appeared in the previous version of the taxonomy (although they are within the ambit of the table linkbase specification) respondents are asked to consider if these layout features will cause them implementation problems.
N/A
Taxonomy file version tags: Respondents’ views are sought on the relative value of each approach, or any reasonable alternative.
N/A
Introduction approach: Respondents’ opinions are sought on any practical considerations as to the date of transition to remittance under the 2.1 sub taxonomies.
N/A
General comments:
In the column 180 from C.14.00 table, ITS say:

“The institution shall report the letter code according to the relevant interval"

However, in the taxonomy, the metric for this cell is “eba_ii175”, refering to “integer”.

(affecting column 180 from C.14.00 table, either COREP 2.0 or COREP 2.1)

Would be possible to generate a new domain encompassing the ITS´s number ranges? To avoid confusions between reporting a number or a letter
Contact name
Pilar de Pablo Blasco